Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Edge Interactive Publishing Inc.

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. These nudity images serve no educational purpose.

Unnamed UserName me 18:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but attacking all of our uploads, which take hours to prepare, upload, and keyword, just because the complainer doesn't lke or understand nudity or personalities, is the most base of attacks. All of these images have already been vetted for copyright, which we possess, and have educational and artistic merit. The fact that seven years after their posting (in some cases), that an individual seeks to supress sexual information is disturbing, and the fact I am called upon to rebut this nonsense is even more disturbing. Wikimedia is not the only place these anti-sexers are mounting attacks. Among other things, they are making endless claims re DMCA that they have some kind of standing in material they do not, and are violating the spirit of the law. The fact this nudity-attacker wants to censor the rest of the world to their own sexual view of the world has no place in wikimedia.

With regard to these imagr tactically: Bella Vendetta is famous for her tattoos, and the examples shown are top rate. Jade Blue is a famous performance artist who also does sex work. Phoenix Marie pictures from Exxxotica 2010 already exist in Wikimedia and these complement those. Stoya is a famous adult actress. The Janella Cage and Laurie Pascal bikini images are examples of contemporary swimsuits.

Given the hundreds of images in wikimedia that depict nudity of men and women, photographs and paintings, it would be a sad day indeed if wikimedia becomes so woke and politically correct that it seeks to cancel information about people's sexual interests, behaviors, and proclivities. We have enough of this in the culture already.

If this user doesn't want to see nudity then they shouldn't go hunting for it, and they have no business trying to repress images and information about sex, sexual practices, sexual personalities, and nudity of the human body.

I find this request to be extremely offensive, especially because of its broad scope and targeting. How many other libraries is this person targeting? I am a frequent a user of wikimedia's contributions especially in the areas of nudity including painting, actresses and porn stars and value those contributions! I am contributor in at least three different categories, a financial donor, and independent artist and photographer. This individual may not be interested in nudity or ideas about sex and arousal but many people are and they need good honest information. More importantly, these are images that have been placed into the public domain so that they can be reused and shared by anybody. I gather this person is against sharing this kind of knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edge Interactive Publishing Inc. (talk • contribs) 20:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I look at this person's name and wonder if it is real or some kind of dark humor. Pronounce it out loud and you will see what I mean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edge Interactive Publishing Inc. (talk • contribs) 20:05, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but Bella Vendetta's bodyart is more than qualified to provide examples. And Jade Blue Eclipse is a famous performance artist. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:184:C501:DEB0:41CB:5BB1:503A:5EC9 (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Closed as Kept per discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]