Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Celeblawyersnyc

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Celeblawyersnyc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Exclusively images of one person (who I assume is the uploader "CelebLawyersNYC" herself) and nothing else, all unused (and this would be pushing things for the "small number of personal photos" exception anyway!)

Commons is not a personal photo album

Ubcule (talk) 23:24, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:41, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Celeblawyersnyc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of images all containing images of "Maryse Selit", none of which appear to have been taken by the subject (no camera metadata or different cameras, different sizes, different whitebalances, etc.). This uploader has uploaded series of self-promotional images before, under a very-slightly-different user name, and other images of this same person were uploaded by a different user, who has since been inactive.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete While, with one exception, which I have deleted, none of these are the same as those deleted before, this is very close to a {{Speedy}}. These are all self promotional and violate COM:ADVERT. The subject briefly had a page on WP:EN which was deleted because she is not notable according to their standards. Our standards are similar, so we don't need to rehash that question here. Also, as Ellin has pointed out, the subject claims "own work" for all of them but they are obviously not selfies, so someone else actually owns the copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]