Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bernd Schwabe in Hannover

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, commons isn't Facebook. Photos of lot lot of not notable persons, and sometimes tons of text on the file description pages. All files are unused. If the uploader can't explain why they are notable, then the files should be deleted.

Steinsplitter (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Steinsplitter: out of project scope + file descriptions like „Diese Dokumentarfotografie als Teil einer größeren Dokumentation und Einladung zur Mitwirkung an der gemeinsamen ehrenamtlichen Arbeit zugunsten der Allgemeinheit über die Plattformen der global aufgestellten Stiftung Wikimedia Foundation wurde im Nachgang zunächst lediglich elektronisch "verkleinert", ansonsten aber noch nicht weiter bearbeitet, um eine zeitnahe Veröffentlichung zu ermöglichen. Herzlich willkommen in Ihrem, Deinem, unserem gemeinsamen und Mitmach-Projekt und Bild(ungs)-Pool in den Sprachen unserer Welt ...“ don´t describes the pictures ... --DCB (talk) 17:17, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Infamous campaign against the work of Bernd Schwabe in Hannover and the Wikipdia-Büro Hannover. Lots of notable persons, the first photo shows the Lord Mayor of Hannover, Stefan Schostok. --Stobaios (talk) 17:59, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Stobaios: Please assume good fiath, see COM:AGF. It isn't fair to call a deletion request "campaign". Nominating potential out-of-scope files is a standard procedure. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Random multiple deletion requests against the work of one of the most active users of the German wikipedia community is not a "standard procedure" especially if the user is not informed about this (korr. --Stobaios (talk) 15:38, 22 January 2017 (UTC)). It is harassment. --Stobaios (talk) 18:37, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Stobaios: Please don't tell the untruth, the user has been informed on his talkpage. Of course, filing a deletion request isn't harassment. And i wouldn't confirm, considering his editcount, that the user is of the most active users at dewp. Ad hominem arguments are not helpful at all, please remain objectively. I suggest you to read COM:MELLOW at that point. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The reason for the nomination doesn't apply. The amount of file description text should be left to the user, it is nothing an admin has to regulate. A lot of photographs show prominent public personalities, politicians like the Lord Mayor of Hannover, artists like Andora and Tobias Madison, personalities like the holocaust survivor Henry Korman and the author Jürgen Piquardt or people from organisations like Janun or Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat. The deleting furor goes as far as wishing to delete a photograph of a supporter of the Wikipedia-Büro Hannover. This deletion list is an attack against the working basis of the Wikimedia community base in Hannover. --Stobaios (talk) 22:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I striked out the by you aforementoined artists. Three files are requiring COM:OTRS permission (galeriekoch.de), the account who claimed permission is blocked on dewp for missing verification. Feel free to strike out other files which are *clearly relevant*. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All, per statements of other users that voted to keep this files and per filenames, descriptions, etc. Tm (talk) 04:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Listenlöschungen sind in meinen Augen der falsche Weg, da jedes Bild eine Prüfung bedarf. Namensgebungen sind Sache des User, der die Bilder hochläd. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 20:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bernd Schwabe is known all over town, white cap, camera and Wikipedia textile strap with name badge. He is present at official events, people know him, they pose in front of his camera, he is the face of Wikipedia in town. He documents the New Year reception in the town hall or a book presentation in the Leibniz Bibliothek. He portrays people like Hans Christian Euler [1], Wolfgang Schröfel [2] or Gero Seelig [3] as a preliminary for new articles, of which he wrote so far more than 2.500. The whole list is documentary work, any deletion would be vandalism.
Only three pictures are left, which are not taken by Bernd Schwabe but come from Galerie Koch [4]. I'll talk to Bernd the next days to take charge of this and clarify the matter. --Stobaios (talk) 01:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Die noch nicht gestrichenen Bilder müssen einzeln geprüft werden, dort scheinen sich noch ein paar in-scope Bilder zu verstecken. Abgesehen davon wurden von allgemeinen Platitüden und ad-hominem-Attacken keine Gründe angegeben, warum die Bilder allgemein in-scope sind. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:41, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weil alle korrekt lizenzierten Bilder "in scope" sind. Du weißt doch nicht, ob irgendein Heimatverein, eine private Homepage oder auch ein kommerzieller Anbieter die Bilder gebrauchen kann. Auch für all sowas ist Commons gedacht. --Ralf Roleček 16:47, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - the author being a respected Wikipedian does not make these pictures in scope. --Jcb (talk) 22:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]