Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Askamundra77

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Askamundra77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Contributions of long term abuser A1cb3. We cannot encourage this long term major nuisance by keeping his uploads

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep We don't punish the images, because we have run out of punishments for the uploader. The images look fine, why was the nominator blocked, they seem to contribute good images. --RAN (talk) 00:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Info: This LTA has uploaded a lot of files that may be copyright violations (Isabelle Sursock's portrait was a copyvio, it's author died in 1984, and Stemma in Pietra dei Principi Colonna e Pignatelli.jpg is a copyvio too, which was previously deleted). 83.61.231.21 18:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Jim, what would you do if these images got deleted and I did reupload the 17th/18th c. paintings? --Achim55 (talk) 13:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep the 17th/18th c. paintings. Many of them are works by well-known painters such as Jacob Ferdinand Voet, Pietro Novelli, Scipione Pulzone, Alexander Roslin, Baciccio, Giovanni Maria Morandi or Teodoro Matteini. 83.61.231.21 13:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete the file Photograph of Princess Maria Milagros Del Drago with her three Children.jpeg: It is a duplicate version of Fotografia della Principessa Maria Milagros Del Drago assieme ai suoi tre Figli.jpeg, which was deleted because was a copyright violation. Templates added by Askamundra77/A3cb1 are clearly bogus because, althoutgh was a photograph taken in Rome, it was first published in the United States with US Voghe Magazine on March 1, 1964, with a copyright notice to the photographers Leombruno-Bodi (Jack Bodi and Joseph Leombruno), so it's still copyrighted for 95 years after publication, time which didn't passed yet. Apart from this, this specific photograph couldn't be in the public domain otherwise, since the photographers died less than 50 years ago (Bodi in 1986 and Leombruno in 2011). This work will be eligible to undeletion in 2060 (95 years after first publication in the U.S.) I informed about that here, but my edition was reverted and the page protected for three months. However, if the files uploaded by this sock are considered to be mass kept, this specific file is still not eligible to be kept due to what I've explained above. 83.61.231.21 12:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 keep.i believe that the files that are not copyrighted and the author has been dead for over a hundred years can be kept as the descriptions clearly state the right license, so i would be in favor of keeping the Files
2.36.99.24 12:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@2.36.99.24: I just hope you're not an IP managed by A3cb1. However, I agree with you regarding the files of paintings from the 17th/18th centuries, as I duly explained yesterday. 83.61.231.21 16:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. However, I deleted all the copyviols (photographs by a3cb1 generally are) + etchings without source/author that looked recent. Ruthven (msg) 14:36, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]