Commons:Deletion requests/Files on User talk:Stefan4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files on User talk:Stefan4

[edit]

Derivative works of trophies.

Stefan4 (talk) 17:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 10:12, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ecemaml, How works the FoP indoors? I've seen that in of panorama the comparative of FoP legislation, in the spanish case it appears unclear "(?) sign". This because the are (or could) be some exceptions, or just another case? maybe We can find some alternatives. --Coentor (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Besides, if We consider the other league throphies as derivatives desings of this one, couldn't We keep the other League trophies files? --Coentor (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
undelete in 2018--Coentor (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This cup appears to be from 1937, so it is protected for 95 years since publication in the United States. Is the year based on the year of death of the author? Who was the author? --Stefan4 (talk) 14:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The main issue with Freedom of Panorama is that it's an exception. That is, my understanding is that such an exception must be explicit (simply because is an exception). If it's not clear (said '?') then the exception does not exist. However, as usual, we lack here the knowledge of the applied legislation (that is, precedents). Sometimes it seems as if we enjoy deleting files, but believe me, it's not the case, at least in my side. Let's other people to tell what they think. --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 14:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all?[1], it would be crazy to try to implement "standards"... Prades (talk) 14:24, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
FOP-Spain is quite imprecise regarding what is "public space", but some references point to freely public accessible indoor space as "public space". This way, a trophy permanently exposed in a club hall could be covered by FOP-Spain, but the same trophy permanently exposed in the club museum would fall outside FOP-Spain (club museums are not freely accessible because a ticket is requested and there is some control of access). Anyway, for most nominated images it could be difficult to locate where is exactly the trophy.--Pere prlpz (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Es evidente que la propiedad intelectual conlleva interpretaciónMuseums Concerned About Unartful Impact of SCOTUS Copyright Casey, lo museos crean debate[2] y controversiaid=1542070. La modificación de la ley de propiedad intelectual[3] sólo nombra a los museos en el artículo 37:Los titulares de los derechos de autor no podrán oponerse a las reproducciones de las obras, cuando aquéllas se realicen sin finalidad lucrativa por los museos, bibliotecas, fonotecas, filmotecas, hemerotecas o archivos de titularidad pública o integradas en instituciones de carácter cultural o científico y la reproducción se realice exclusivamente para fines de investigación o conservación. Por lo tanto, según esta ley, los titulares intelectuales de los trofeos no pueden negarse a que hayan reproducciones en un espacio cultural como es commons. No sé qué dice la ley norteamericana, pero en todo caso, tal como puede verse en el primer enlace de este comentario, varía según la interpretación de jueces... Prades (talk) 15:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Commons no és només un espai cultural. Aquí les fotos es publiquen amb el dret de fer-les servir per qualsevol per qualsevol ús, incloent comercial. Això clarament no és el que diu la llei que cites.--Pere prlpz (talk) 23:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep File:Copa de Campeones.jpg as Freedom of Panorama appears to apply in Spain when works are exhibited outside, as this one is. PeeJay2K3 (talk) 11:43, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted all execpt 2. FOP only applies to publically accessible outdoor locations FASTILY 01:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files on User talk:Stefan4

[edit]

Reopening as there was no explanation as to why two images were kept. The cups are not outdoors, so Fastily's part about FOP does not apply. Also, there is no evidence that the authors died more than 80 years ago, so we don't know whether the copyright has expired in Spain, and as the authors didn't die at least 80 years before 1996, they are still protected by copyright in the United States. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 19:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files on User talk:Stefan4

[edit]

Derivative works of various cups and other things.

Stefan4 (talk) 22:49, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per previous closures. Trophies are sculptural works, and COM:FOP indicates Spanish FoP is not applicable indoors. Эlcobbola talk 19:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files on User talk:Stefan4

[edit]

Unfortunately, there is no evidence that Portuguese coins are free for any reason. There is no section COM:CUR#Portugal.

Stefan4 (talk) 21:03, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Si tu veux consulter la matière, le site de l'OMPI recense le résumé de la législation sur la propriété intellectuelle, avec souvent une traduction en anglais pour chaque état membre, c'est ici. --Dereckson (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pour le Portugal, pas de tradution, et le code ne contient pas le mot « moeda » pour les pièces de monnaie, je ne vois rien non plus en faisant des recherches sur moeda "Direito de Autor" site:pt (en revanche je trouve directement l'information comme quoi le droit d'auteur des nota (billets de banque) appartient à la BCE, tout va bien donc). Enfin, le Portugal et en Europe et ne fait pas partie du Commonwealth, où l'on retrouve le gros des exceptions au droit d'auteur au motif que la production soit gouvernmentale. Tout cela me laisse à penser que le Portugal n'a pas d'exception concernant la monnaie et que le droit d'auteur classique s'applique donc. --Dereckson (talk) 22:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons -FASTILY 00:06, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_on_User_talk:Stefan4&oldid=530342908"