Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps of Japan, 1966
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Stamps of Japan, 1966
[edit]The copyright on these stamps was restored by the URAA. So the images of them should be deleted as COPYVIO per the precautionary principle until at least 2,062.
- File:Butterflies Postage stamp Phylately week Japan 1966.jpg
- File:Japan 1966 Mi 928y stamp with phosphor frame (New Animal, Plant, & National Treasure Series. The Goldfish (Carassius auratus)) cancelled.jpg
- File:Japan 1966 Mi 929Ay stamp with phosphor frame (New Animal, Plant, & National Treasure Series. Chrysanthemums (Chrysanthemum × morifolium)).jpg
)_cancelled.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 00:31, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Japan#Stamps, Japanese stamps "more than 70 years old or published before 1 January 1968 are in the public domain".
Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- Your ignoring that the copyright status was renewed by the URAA. And licenses have to be covered by a valid license in the United States in the meantime, which the quote you cited clearly doesn't qualify as because it's not a license. So outside of the quote from the guidelines what license in the files is valid in the United States? It's clearly not PD-Japan-organization or PD-Japan because they aren't from the United States and there's really isn't anything outside of those except the URAA. So which license is it then? Or are you asserting that these images don't have to have valid licenses to be hosted on Commons? --Adamant1 (talk) 08:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- You assume that the stamp was still under copyright in Japan in 1996. Do you have a source for this? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 10:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- Your ignoring that the copyright status was renewed by the URAA. And licenses have to be covered by a valid license in the United States in the meantime, which the quote you cited clearly doesn't qualify as because it's not a license. So outside of the quote from the guidelines what license in the files is valid in the United States? It's clearly not PD-Japan-organization or PD-Japan because they aren't from the United States and there's really isn't anything outside of those except the URAA. So which license is it then? Or are you asserting that these images don't have to have valid licenses to be hosted on Commons? --Adamant1 (talk) 08:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC)