Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Nina Clausing
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Stamps by Nina Clausing
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany stamps of this country are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the death of the artist. I couldn't find any information about the artist of these stamps, Nina Clausing, but they were published in mid 2000s. So it's impossible that they have been dead for at least 70 years.
- File:Denkmal Scharnhorststr 6 (Mitte) Betriebsschule der Deutschen Post.jpg
- File:DPAG 2010 33 Postkutsche.jpg
- File:DPAG 2012 Blaue Reiter.jpg
- File:Postwertzeichen DPAG - 50 Jahre Bundeswehr 2005.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 22:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hier greift die Panoramafreiheit. Keep. -- OTFW (talk) 09:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe for the first image. Although I doubt it does since the stamp takes up most of the image and FoP doesn't cover temporary works. The other images clearly don't have anything to do with freedom of panorama either way though. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:30, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- File:Denkmal Scharnhorststr 6 (Mitte) Betriebsschule der Deutschen Post.jpg: Hier greift die Panoramafreiheit. Es handelt sich offenbar nicht um ein vorübergehendes Werk. Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:18, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- File:DPAG 2010 33 Postkutsche.jpg: Die Abbildung einer Postkutsche ist offenbar schon sehr alt ({{PD-old-100-expired}}), die Schriftzeichen erreichen keine Schöpfungshöhe ({{PD-text}}). Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:18, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- File:DPAG 2012 Blaue Reiter.jpg: Der Maler Franz Marc starb schon 1916 ({{PD-old-100-expired}}), die Schriftzeichen erreichen keine Schöpfungshöhe ({{PD-text}}). Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:18, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- It's super nitpicky, but you should only vote once. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Es sind drei Bilder, und es sind unterschiedliche Gründe, aus denen die Löschung abzulehnen ist. Wo steht, dass ich das alles in einem einzigen Votum vermischen muss, anstatt eine strukturierte Diskussion zu jedem einzelnen Bild zu ermöglichen? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:36, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure where exactly it says so in the guidelines, but at least from what I understand people should only vote once in any given DR. If nothing else you could at least do it that way as curtesy because I asked you to do it that way. Otherwise I'm then willing to ask about it on village pump if your not willing to. Although I don't think it will result in people saying fine for someone to vote as many times as they want to. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- Es sind drei Bilder, und es sind unterschiedliche Gründe, aus denen die Löschung abzulehnen ist. Wo steht, dass ich das alles in einem einzigen Votum vermischen muss, anstatt eine strukturierte Diskussion zu jedem einzelnen Bild zu ermöglichen? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:36, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- It's super nitpicky, but you should only vote once. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: all as either some case of PD-old or PD-ineligible. --Rosenzweig τ 10:54, 12 August 2023 (UTC)