Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Shenyang Metro Station Name Calligraphy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for indoor places as {{FoP-China}} specifically requires outdoor place. Calligraphy is protected in China per COM:TOO China. These photos all include calligraphy created by living or recently died (much shorter than 50 years) persons. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Guangzhou Metro L3 Canton Tower Station.JPG, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Art in Shanghai Metro stations, and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Murals in Beijing Subway stations.

Wcam (talk) 13:15, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all per nom. Eti15TrSf (talk) 00:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: do you still think these could be undeleted with the new copyright law change? Looking at the new law there is no mention about calligraphy. They are still protected per COM:TOO China. Unfortunaly the only way to get them undeleted is to wait for a very long time for the files to be in the public domain. Eti15TrSf (talk) 06:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Eti15TrSf: is calligraphy considered an artistic work, a literary work, or other work of some sort? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: I can't really answer that question, but I feel that keeping these files could be problematic. Its possible that the intent of creating these works is to say the metro station name in an artistic form. The reason why I say it could be problematic is someone could see that files and claim that they violate COM:TOO China. It clearly says there that most calligraphy letters are protected by copyright. I personally feel that the safer route is to wait until these enter the Public Domain, so nobody would be able to question how it violates TOO China. Eti15TrSf (talk) 07:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think these images might be kept under the current FoP of China. As written on Template:FoP-China work may be used ... provided that the name of the author and the title of the work shall be indicated. In the listing of images by Wcam, many of the authors name are given. Can somebody with sufficient knowledge of the language please include name of the authors and titles of the work on the file pages? Can you please indicate which of the list can be kept? Ping to admins with the zh language: @Jusjih: , @King of Hearts: @Minorax: , @Mys 721tx: , @Shizhao: . Thanks, Elly (talk) 21:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

deleted – In the discussion above it is not shown beyond any doubt that these images can be maintained. Therefore deleted per nomination and Commons:Precautionary principle. Elly (talk) 18:30, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]