Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Samsung Galaxy S I9000

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Samsung Galaxy S I9000

[edit]

Non-free screen photos/images.

Eleassar (t/p) 10:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Later added by User:1Veertje:[1]


Discussion

No screensaver photo on Android Market.jpg, logos are thin part of photo. No copyvio. --Mile (talk) 10:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They're an indispensable part of the Android Market, and thus not dm. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:01, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, even logo at large isn't copyvio, thus mus bus. --Mile (talk) 11:12, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So where is your evidence for the claim that these logos are not copyrighted? --Eleassar (t/p) 11:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is the issue with File:GalaxyS Replicant homescreen.jpg? All the graphics on-screen are convered by the Apache 2 license AFAIK. --PaulK (talk) 12:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is true, then there is no issue. Can you provide a source for this? --Eleassar (t/p) 12:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Background is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Autumn_landscape_near_Gullesfjordbotn,_Hinn%C3%B8ya,_2010_September.jpg (it is given proper credit in the Replicant Wallpaper selection thing), the icons are all from the Android apps (e.g. for email: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/packages/apps/Email/+/android-4.0.4_r2.1/res/mipmap-hdpi/ic_launcher_email.png) and their license is very clearly the Apache 2: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/packages/apps/Email/+/android-4.0.4_r2.1/NOTICE and https://android.googlesource.com/platform/packages/apps/Email/+/android-4.0.4_r2.1/MODULE_LICENSE_APACHE2 This goes for all the icons shown on the device's screen (I am frankly too lazy to lookup all the links but they are all Apache 2 as well).
Ok. Can you check for others too? --Eleassar (t/p) 18:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All the other icons are Apache 2 as well. Can you remove the file from the deletion list?
I'm withdrawing my deletion request for this file (also tagged above). I meant if you could check for other files whether they're free (currently, they must be presumed non-free). --Eleassar (t/p) 20:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I did check for all these icons on my local copy of the Android tree that is used to build Replicant. Do you need all the links to the AOSP repos or is my word enough?
I meant for the files that I have listed in the nomination in addition to yours. The links would be necessary, so that this is verifiable. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am the uploader of File:Samsung-galaxy-tab.jpg. Thanks for your attention to the photo after the flickr bot approved it. After reading through this discussion, I would agree #5 here applies. I understand the photographed artwork, such as icons and wallpaper, is copyrighted and is a problem (which, I think, also explains a large number of photos of mobiles with Commons homepage open: it is free content). This should not be a problem with my future uploads. Gryllida 09:34, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why have the Galaxy S2 Replicant photos been nominated here? It was made very clear that Replicant only shows material that is under a free software license. Could you please explain the reason of the nomination? As for the Galaxy Tab pictures, not much I can say to argue, so you can go ahead and delete them.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulK (talk • contribs)

It was not made clear at any of the image description pages; and where exactly was it made clear? --Eleassar (t/p) 20:05, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It was made clear right here, that's the last statement I wrote. Though I understand the attribution was not given on the picture's metadata, but it's not a reason to delete the pictures. I'll try to add mention to it on the pictures I added that show the screen of Replicant, at some point. --PaulK (talk) 20:14, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't follow you... The nomination was published before you clarified this. You've clarified the copyright status only for File:GalaxyS Replicant homescreen.jpg, and I've withdrawn the nomination for this file. --Eleassar (t/p) 20:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Galaxy S2 files I'm talking about were added minutes ago as far as I could see. That's what I'm talking about, and obviously what I clarified for The Galaxy S picture applies to all the other pictures showing the Replicant home screen as it's the same in every case. --PaulK (talk) 20:41, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I see; however, these were added by someone else, not me.[2] I've tagged them accordingly; of course, these are free too. --Eleassar (t/p) 20:44, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could User:1Veertje explain the reason why the files showing the Replicant screens are still nominated for removal? --PaulK (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 00:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Samsung_Galaxy_S_I9000&oldid=785003564"