Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Proposed and fictional Presidential Standards
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of COM:SCOPE; COM:NOTHOST
- File:Flag of the President of the Confederate States.svg
- File:Flag of the Vice-President of the Confederate States.svg
- File:Standard of the President of the Soviet Union (fictional).svg
GPinkerton (talk) 10:52, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Just to note that I was not the creator of the image.--Carnby (talk) 12:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Carnby Huh ... I have no idea why you got that notification, sorry ... the creator was notified here. GPinkerton (talk) 12:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep all. COM:SCOPE does not exclude depictions of fantasy or fiction. In the absence of broad consensus on whether these files should be deleted, the status quo is to keep, and the impetus is on the nominator (or others who want to delete) to provide reasoning for why these individual flags are out of scope. (COM:PRP does not apply because this is not a copyright-based deletion request.) The nominator has failed to articulate substantial evidence or reasoning to delete on the basis of the project scope, so I oppose this deletion request. Mysterymanblue 05:48, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yes it does. There is consensus to delete all files which are not educational. There is no way the nominated files could be educational, and they therefore must be deleted. That is the status quo. The argument made above that policy must be adhered to in cases of copyright but can be ignored in all other circumstances is as wrong as it sounds. The keep vote above was not based on substantial evidence or reasoning that the image is somehow within project scope, and should therefore be ignored. GPinkerton (talk) 09:19, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: 2 are in use at little active wp's (although they should be removed there as misleading). Renomimate once unused. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 27 August 2021 (UTC)