Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:NeocoreGames
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:NeocoreGames
[edit]Paradox Interactive Logo isn't covered by OTRS ticket, which only allows screenshots/concept art.
Uploader originally removed logo and requested old revisions deletion, but processing the request, it occurred to me logo could be de minimis. We allowed in the past for example coffee machine with Nespresso logo.
So the question is are the logo de minimis?. If so, we should revert the logos removal on each version. If not, we should delete them (the revisions, not the files).
Warning. As mentioned before, this DR concerns old revisions of the file. It doesn't pursue to delete current files.
File:Fallen Champions concept art 3.jpg- File:Fallen Champions screenshot 2.jpg
- File:Fallen Champions screenshot 3.jpg
- File:Fallen Champions screenshot 4.jpg
- File:Fallen Champions screenshot 5.jpg
- File:Fallen Champions screenshot.jpg
- File:King Arthur II concept art 1.jpg
- File:King Arthur II concept art 2.jpg
- File:King Arthur II concept art 3.jpg
- File:King Arthur II concept art 4.jpg
- File:King Arthur II screenshot 6.jpg
- File:King Arthur II screenshot 7.jpg
- File:King Arthur II screenshot 8.jpg
- File:King Arthur II screenshot 9.jpg
- File:Kings' Crusade cover art.jpg
Dereckson (talk) 01:43, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- I struck out one image as it did not contain the logo. --Odie5533 (talk) 03:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete the old revisions w/ logos per COM:PRP. The logo is/was designed as part of the bottom banner which is an integral part of each screenshot, so COM:DM might not apply. Then again it's tiny so DM might be ok. Deleting would be the safe way to go. INeverCry 19:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- The logo is clearly not integral to the image since it can be removed and the image still functions. See COM:DM "Copyrighted work X is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the image subject, but is not essential to the subject (blacking it out would not make the file useless)". --Odie5533 (talk) 08:22, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC)