Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Loro e Parisini building
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Loro e Parisini building
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Luigi Caccia Dominioni, died in 2016. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2087.
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6340523.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6340529.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6340533.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6340535.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6362225.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6366166.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 06:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep We generally assume that government institutions, such as Biblioteca Europea di Informazione e Cultura have the legal right to release images under a creative commons license, and they have cleared the rights through their legal departments. In the past, if the institution withdraws the license then we should delete the image. We have several examples where, when notified, images have been withdrawn and other cases where the institution has stood by their right to release under a CC license. For instance we have retained images released by the Library of Congress, even though Getty Images has claimed an active copyright. --RAN (talk) 22:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Actually that's not what we do. What does usually happen is that images are taken on a case by case basis depending on the circumstances, which is why I nominated these ones for deletion. If you had of bothered looking into it there's plenty of evidence to think that the license in this case isn't valid, or at least not for Commons, since if you look at Commons:BEIC it clearly states their claim that Paolo Monti obtained the rights to the buildings from the originals architects is "the story of the photos as we know of it" and that even if he did, said rights specifically only covered "future publications authored by Paolo Monti." Now the last time I checked neither Commons or whomever decides to reuse these images are Paolo Monti are they? Nor is a statement of "well, those are the facts as we know them" a clear confirmation that everything is above board with the license. And those quotes are their own word about the license that your the one saying we should accept as factual BTW. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per RAN. -- Ooligan (talk) 02:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)