Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jesus Is Lord Colleges Foundation
Jesus is lord began in 1978 as said in https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_Is_Lord_Church_Worldwide therfore no freedom of panorama in the phils and no pernission from the architect. No way this is an old architecture
- File:JfBarangaysChurches008BocaueBulacanfvf.JPG
- File:JfBarangaysChurches025BocaueBulacanfvf.JPG
- File:JfBarangaysChurches027BocaueBulacanfvf.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 08.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 09.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 10.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 11.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 12.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 13.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 14.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 15.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 16.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 17.JPG
- File:JfJILChurch9927BocaueBunlolfvf 01.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 10:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Strong objection to DR Request that has no legal basis
- Keep Category:Jesus is Lord Church Philippines Category:Jesus Is Lord Colleges Foundation When I visited the Main Church in Bunlo, Bocaue, I asked permission; and in this Main Church Building and School plus Foundation, Bulacan, I was even invited to join the Prayer meeting as I was told that all these are Communal Effort: that is: funds donated by kind Members; the same thing for all other JIL Churches in provinces or cities; unlike some Churches of the Rich and Famous where architects are paid and commissioned and thereafter transfer all their Copyrights and all other rights to the Titutar Bishop or Archbishop as required by Canon Law creation of a Parish Church from Chapel or Quasi-Parish; the same with JIL Churches: no Copyright exists for any worker, or foreman
- There is no evidence whatsoever, than false news, false facts and figments of imagination including inventions so to speak, irrational judgdments and bickerings without any legal basis of proof of Copyright possession, as required by the New SC Circulars and IPO Locus Standi to question Copyright Infringement;
- Keep Because you have not submitted any evidence whether URL, photos or history notes that an architect was paid and hired to build this JIL foundation; on the other hand, my tricycle driver, fish vendor and in my research while I am taking my laundry, a JIL member told me that it is their door to door asking for help to build this Church; many of them physically worked like canteros, piyons and contruction workers, painters in what Wikipedia defines Bayanihan Communal_work
Discussion, argument and reasons to Keep the photos
|
---|
FOP matter update: Rejoinder FOP matter update: Rejoinder
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
- I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator Never return Adiós Judgefloro (talk) 06:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator was blocked temporarily due to mass nomination of images from PH. Someone else can review and nominate if they see fit. Thanks. --Missvain (talk) 00:07, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Reviewing this architectural object here. According to edukasyon.ph, the institution incepted in 1983, but the first batch of high school graduates was in 1992 (most likely the year when this building was completed or built). There is still no FOP in the Philippines, and authorization from the architect for the uploader's use of commercial licensing is required.
- File:JfBarangaysChurches008BocaueBulacanfvf.JPG
- File:JfBarangaysChurches025BocaueBulacanfvf.JPG
- File:JfBarangaysChurches027BocaueBulacanfvf.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 08.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 09.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 10.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 11.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 12.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 13.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 14.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 15.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 16.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 17.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 19.JPG
- File:JfJIL9957BocaueBunlofvf 20.JPG
- File:JfJILChurch9927BocaueBunlolfvf 01.JPG
- File:JfJILChurch9927BocaueBunlolfvf 10.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:44, 19 April 2021 (UTC)