Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Diània.tv videos
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Diània.tv videos
[edit]Inconsistent license information. While the license chosen in YouTube is CC-BY-3.0, the initial footage of every video claims a non-commercial CC license
- File:David Fernàndez A Cop de Cup al Centre Ovidi Montllor.webm
- File:Enric Morera ens conta On van els nostres diners al Centre Polivalent d'Onil.webm
- File:La nostra terra com a referent de l'economia de baix a dalt, per al bé comú.webm
- File:La sanitat militar republicana durant la guerra civil espanyola.webm
- File:Presentació del llibre Somiant amb Aleixa, Premi de Literatura Eròtica de la Vall d'Albaida.webm
- File:Presentació del llibre Tierra de Saqueo de Sergi Castillo a Muro.webm
- File:VI Jornada sobre la dona en la festa La Nova Muixeranga d'Algemesí.webm
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:24, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- We had an ORTS authorisation sent by e-mail, talk with Vriullop, please.--Coentor (talk) 10:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Ticket OTRS:7882386 was closed with no action as the license in YouTube page was changed to CC-BY-3.0. Anyway it is a prove that the owner agreed to change the license at least in 5 of these files. In case of dual license one may choose any of them. --V.Riullop (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Anyway, as V. Riullop has pointed out, Commons:Multi-licensing states what follows Commons contributors can offer as many licenses for a file as they wish, as long as at least one of them meets the criteria for free licenses specified in the licensing policy. For example, files under a "non-commercial" license are OK only if they are at the same time also released under a free license that allows commercial use. For me, that's fine and therefore Keep Best regards and sorry for any inconvenience (it's not always possible to know each and every commons policy or guideline on copyrights :-)) --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per Discasto's request Alan (talk) 03:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)