Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chiesa di San Biagio (Monza)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Luigi Caccia Dominioni, died in 2016. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2087.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamant1 are you kidding me, right? File:MB-Monza-chiesa-San-Biagio-copertura-campanile.jpg is a part of the XVIIIth century demolished church, how can it possibly be under copyright? File:MB-Monza-campanile-chiesa-san-Biagio.jpg is IMO under ToO, which in Italy is quite high, basic rectangular building. Friniate (talk) 11:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The tower on the ground is sure, but the modern building is pretty visible in the background. I disagree that the other image is under ToO since there's unique aspects to the tower and the roof of the building is visible at the bottom of the image. I'm going to lose any sleep over this if whomever closes this keeps either one because they disagree with my assessment though. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the bulding behind is below ToO, but in any case it could be blurred, the subject of the photo is clearly the part of the old church. And, what unique aspects are you talking about, the cross on the roof? Quite unusual for a church I must say (and in any case it would fall under de minimis). Friniate (talk) 12:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Blur it then and I'll remove it from the deletion request. Is there just no roof design that you think is original? lol. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, I don't think that it's necessary to blur it, it's below ToO anyway IMO. But if you're so afraid that the artist could come up and bring wmf in court, then blur it. Friniate (talk) 16:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But if you're so afraid that the artist could come up and bring wmf in court, then blur it. COM:PCP "Arguments that amount to "we can get away with it", such as the following, are against Commons' aims: 'The copyright owner will not bother to sue or cannot afford to.'"
That's not what I was saying, I genuinely think that the building in the background has a lower uniqueness than the cases deemed has acceptable in Commons:Threshold_of_originality#Italy.--Friniate (talk) 11:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Friniate. holly {chat} 20:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]