Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Casinò di Campione

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in Italy as is clearly stated at the category. Only photographs taken from Switzerland are allowed. The ones nominated are all close ups of parts and details of the building.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Friniate: Wouldn’t it be much better to have a link to this permission PDF on each file description page? Or even better have a copy of this PDF in the VRT data base? — Speravir02:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Speravir Well, there is a link to the authorization through the Template:Monumento italiano, although maybe it could be more visible. I agree that it would be better to have these authorizations in the VRT database, but that is something that should be discussed with the people from WMI who organize the contest (the issue was most recently discussed here by @Ruthven and @Paolo Casagrande (WMIT)). Friniate (talk) 09:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, I do not see such a link in the template. — Speravir00:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"This is a photo of a monument which is part of cultural heritage of Italy. This monument participates in the contest Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018. See authorisations" You have to click on "authorisations". Friniate (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Later insert:) Friniate and Ruthven, just as information: The template {{Monumento italiano}} was not up to date in German (the language I am speaking) and Macedonian – both lacked the link to the authorisations Friniate referred to. I’ve updated them both: German, Macedonian. If this were present I probably wouldn’t have asked here and in VRT noticeboard. — Speravir01:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Speravir Thank you! Friniate (talk) 10:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Friniate Do you happen to have a direct link the to permission? Because the one in the file page is not specific enough. Ruthven (msg) 12:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven [1] Friniate (talk) 12:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Friniate It seems that the permission is for WLM only. It's badly written, as I said many times. In any case,  Keep given that:
  1. the correct link is used for the Files, and not the generic one as currently done
  2. WLM only photographs are authorised
Cheers, Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes yes, it's for WLM only, but all the photos were uploaded within WLM so it's not an issue... As for the link, it cannot be changed manually, somebody more expert than me should modify the template in order to allow that... Friniate (talk) 12:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I've added manually the links to the authorizations in all the images involved. Friniate (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Photographs have an authorization. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]