Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:05F2uIhfx0Rv

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:05F2uIhfx0Rv

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

  • (Redacted)
  • (Redacted)
  • (Redacted)
  • (Redacted)

Minorax (talk) 12:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your warning, categories added to images that listed above. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 19:41, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also for private photos, you can see COM:PEOPLE. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 19:50, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And without additional categories these photos are in --> Category:05F2uIhfx0Rv --> Category:Wikipedians by name --> Category:Wikipedians, this category is personal. also images are standard and usable as i added categories. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 20:34, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please be careful about nomination users personal images for deletion. before it read COM:INUSE (about me, you can see WP:REALNAME, my edits on Wikipedia are with another account.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk • contribs) 21:11, 29 July 2019? (UTC)
Used in categories is not considered inuse. Minorax (talk) 22:51, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@05F2uIhfx0Rv: What account do you use for your edits on Wikipedia?   — Jeff G. ? please ping or talk to me 08:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G./talk: , Thanks for your request. please write your email addressee here, then i send you some of my accounts.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 08:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@05F2uIhfx0Rv: Please see Special:EmailUser/Jeff G. and Template:re.   — Jeff G. ? please ping or talk to me 09:02, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G./talk: , Sent.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 10:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe one or two could be kept. --Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 23:49, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia is a large community, here we can't say and do whatever we think or want. Like a real society, please use law here too and answer me by linking to polities of commons (exact words and sentence!) that say these files should remove. I read Commons:Policies and guidelines COM:POL again, I checked other files in categories I used for images. Those files are similar to these photographs i uploaded. The only problem ((may!)) i see is about Commons:File naming COM:FN. But per COM:INUSE " The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project " i think i can use my name and user name as files and descriptions as above sentence. Also as i don't use commons as my personal web host COM:NOTHOST, but per COM:REUSE i can use it as a host for the useful images that i choose to upload them here! When there is a category about three quarter view photograph of men, i can upload a photo to that category and etc. and not in use currently is not a good reason for delete an image, some of 55,225,898 freely usable (today statistics) was, are, will or not in use. Please check this _Category:Wikipedians by name_ And _Category:Wikipedians_, look at other people uploads that are like my uploads. I need a logical reason for your insistence to delete my uploads. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 01:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also a portrait photograph is not a scientific diagram, don't judge it as that kind of content! 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 01:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you want the files to be kept, please use it on your own user page here or on any other sister projects. As you said “The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project”. And I just checked, the only in-use file in the category and wasn’t nominated for this DR is redacted. Minorax (talk) 03:11, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I used them in my Meta wiki global page.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 08:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what did you mean with that long response to such a short comment. Anyway, I vote  Delete. This user has no edits elsewhere (see centralauth) and there is no point in hosting these photos because, as some others have pointed out, there is no substantive edit history either. Nearly all of his uploads are these selfies.
 Comment Please don't comment or before commenting read whole talk.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 09:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your comment is completely pointless. Sorry. --Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 16:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
if your read other comments you find out this username is not my username for edits. i don't want to explain it again (in this comment) because i wrote about it in this talk page before. Thanks. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 20:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete as likely copyvios. Uploader is the subject of the photos but its clear that he couldn't have taken them. There is no exif either so unlikely to be own work. Also, INUSE is not a hard and fast rule when the photos are only used for self promotion by someone who is not a valid or active contributor. Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I used a software (exif tag remover), And here in Commons:Exif there's not any rule for delete image that hasn't exif! Also, I'm the owner of images and i can prove it by sending email COM:ET. Also COM:PEOPLE _The right of privacy_ "For a self-portrait, where the subject of the photograph is also the photographer and/or uploader, consent is assumed, provided they are capable of giving appropriate consent (as noted above)", as you see PHOTOGRAPHER AND/OR UPLOADER. I can prove i am (or was) an active user on wikipedia and commons wikimedia, by sending an email if needed.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 08:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment If you can prove ownership I would be happy to keep one for use on your user page Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Images are in right categories, also per COM:FN names, descriptions and categories can be changed (if community think these images are for self-promotion because they are contain the name of uploader). why there are many images like my images on commons wikimedia?what is the problem with them? if the only problem is (my name categories) and (file names & descriptions), i can request to change them.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 08:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I edited images descriptions.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment per Gbawden, also, keeping all in use on a single page isn’t going to work either. What if a user uploads 50 images of himself and keep it in apparent use on a single page? Are we going to keep all 50? Minorax (talk) 10:33, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Any updates from this user? Minorax (talk) 10:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: Yes, but commenting on them in public would be inappropriate.   — Jeff G. ? please ping or talk to me 10:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: @Gbawden: , if i can prove ownership and request to change name of images to descriptive and more acceptable names, also remove my name and my category from them and their descriptions, can i keep them? for example in useful categories you see in each photograph category like Rembrandt lighting category? 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 10:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The problem isn’t about the file names, it is about the copyright holder of the image. Having you inside the file doesn’t mean that you’re the copyright holder. Minorax (talk) 11:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Canon EOS 70D, 1/125sec, iso 100, 35 mm. these are exif of those images and for color balance i used photoshop cc 2018. these are my own photographs used timer. if you need prove i can send my other raw and unused images in that time and same location to a verified member, also i can verify my user name however it's my real name even with passport my email and other professional accounts on web. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 11:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Even if you could prove that the copyright holder is you, can you answer the following questions? Minorax (talk) 12:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
1. Why shouldn't the files be deleted "per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s)."
2. Why shouldn't the files be speedied under COM:CSD#F10? ~100/156 (151 commons, 5 meta) of your global contribution is related to the nominated files.
3. Why should the files be kept? Is there a need to have 5 pictures of yourself on your user/talk page?
::1- about COM:CSD#F10,i requested to delete my two files:
  • redacted
  • redacted
other files are not selfie or "low-to-medium" quality, they are high quality and can be used (as i used them in right categories, please ::check categories i used for my images and also check other media in that categories to see my works are better than most of them).
2- i wonder why you cite COM:NOTHOST, i never used commons as my free web host but as your and other members said, i requested to delete two of my files that i think under COM:OOS should be deleted.
Quoting from COM:INUSE, "The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project." You created your account on en.wiki on 28 August 2017, which is 23 months ago. Since then, you have only 158 edits (as time of writing this), which is approximately 7 edits per month, this isn't considered as active.
3- about Personal/Private photo(s), i cited COM:IDENT, that clearly wrote there if the "subject of the photograph is also the photographer and/or uploader" i don't see any problem with upload my uploads. as i said if needed i can prove i'm the photographer, the subject and the uploader.
So where do you plan to use it? Such private image collections do not become educational even if displayed as a gallery on a user page on Commons or elsewhere.
4- i don't want to use all of them in my personal page, you forced me to do that. as i wrote do you think all 55,229,633 freely usable media (today main page text) must be used somewhere now?
Clarification, I did not force you. I just said that for a personal file to be in scope, it has to be used. Minorax (talk) 13:06, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
5- i emailed jeff, but if jeff need more details i should think and search more for my forgotten users, uploads and eidts.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 12:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: , I answered your questions before.
1- they are in categories, check that categories and think where you(or anybody) can use them inside wikimedia or outside it COM:REUSE . they are not for my personal use (if you think, then they are not for my personal use only!) they are shared under free licensing not for my personal use. as i said if admins think their names has problem i can change their names to more descriptive names.
Why would other users use your personal image? Is there any use for it on any other page other than your own user page?
2- before you ask new question read my answers! new account in not new member WP:REALNAME, me and jeff conversation is about this that am i a active member or not (by another accounts or ip edits!) 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 13:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I nominated your images when they were unused, not based on when you started to edit on any wikimedia project. Furthermore, I only realised that your uploads fufill COM:CSD#F10 after checking CentralAuth. Minorax (talk) 15:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
by Wikimedia commons policies (in general) i can keep my photograph. may one say no but i linked to others that say yes. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 17:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: When user mentioned accounts above, exactly how many are there? Minorax (talk) 11:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: It's tough to tell. Aside from three named users, mentioned works included a cat, Wikipedia articles, and files.   — Jeff G. ? please ping or talk to me 11:33, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Could you do a rough check to see if the named users have substantial edits? Minorax (talk) 11:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I want to delete
  • redacted
  • redacted
and for other if possible, request me to verify my account, then rename them to descriptive names. then remove my user from descriptions and categories.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 11:04, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: , which way is faster for delete these two images?05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment if you think here is not a place for uploading our photographs (in some cases!) please request to delete all files in this category Category:Wikipedians. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 17:04, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We’re already in the midst of clearing the category up. As some users are tireless contributors to wikimedia projects, whether its commons or other projects, their small amount of personal files will not be deleted. Minorax (talk) 22:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A good chunk of those images are either on editors userpages or pages relating to that user, I know over at EN there was a page which had a good chunk of peoples selfies and their names - I assume it was created back when Wikipedia was just getting started ... so those images as well as those on userpages should not be deleted, Also just because there's images in that category that isn't a justification for us to keep yours,
Ofcourse you could now technically use your image on your userpage as a way to keep your images however that's not going to wash either,
Your images are more of a modeling nature than they are "Wikimedianish" so as such IMHO your images should still be deleted accordingly, You're more than welcome to use Facebook or even Insta. –Davey2010Talk 23:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comment but as wikipedia structure, all users have equal rights. if you think my work is wrong, please create a topic in Commons:Bureaucrats' noticeboard, and explain this case to delete all other members uploads too. i think i can keep 3 images (i request to delete two selfie!).05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 23:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This has nothing do with equal rights - The point of Commons is that you upload images in scope for others internally or externally to use, Back in the day scope wasn't an issue atleast not like it is now, I don't need to go to BN - We have DR which does the job fine. –Davey2010Talk 00:46, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see this tag or template!05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 23:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I’m requesting the deleting admin to remove it. I added that in because there is no need to sign every single subsection when edited at the same time and it prevents signbot from adding {{Unsigned}}. Minorax (talk) 02:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
i requested in admins notice board for delete them.let's talk about my other 3 portraits. 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 23:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Davey2010 and I requested for it to be kept open until this discussion has ended. Minorax (talk) 02:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but i thought that two photos effect on users comments on all other photos.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 09:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info My reason and cited policies: Per COM:PEOPLE, COM:ET, COM:INUSE, WP:USERNAME(can prove activity with other usernames), COM:REUSE Delete redacted, redacted and Keep other Or Per COM:FN, COM:OOS, COM:PEOPLE, COM:ET Delete redacted, :: redacted and after change names, and edit categories and description use redacted and redacted in photography related categories like Category:Rembrandt lighting and etc (some categories added). 05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 22:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As uploader i vote to delete files.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 23:57, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ? 17:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:05F2uIhfx0Rv&oldid=415599313"