Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:panoramio.com/user/1971062

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Panoramio user, all stolen images, low res but high quality etc. Every image is found elsewhere with higher res. All images have been downscaled and cropped, which has stripped all camera data. All images seem to be places in Lahore

I thought the user was ok, as many images are 500 x 375 resolution - maybe they had a old camera? But Google search File:Lahore - panoramio - NAMMEWALLE (3).jpg and File:Lahore - panoramio - NAMMEWALLE (73).jpg and they have higher res from completely different websites. Examples..

  1. File:Lahore - panoramio - NAMMEWALLE (1).jpg higher res on Japanese websites via Google search
  2. File:Lahore - panoramio - NAMMEWALLE (35).jpg higher res via Google search
  3. File:BANAAIZEER - panoramio.jpg stolen press image of politician

Only two have their data, File:Khushab Tehsil, Pakistan - panoramio.jpg and File:- panoramio - NAMMEWALLE (1).jpg, note the very high resolution this time! I guess these are personal images? Who knows. Useless anyway.

BevinKacon (talk) 15:38, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lahore - panoramio - NAMMEWALLE (35).jpg shows up with a higher resolution on http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/98243.jpg. I thought they shut down Panoramio?
File:Lahore - panoramio - NAMMEWALLE (1).jpg is indeed more detailed on http://joy555.blogspot.com/2010/03/blog-post_24.html.
File:BANAAIZEER - panoramio.jpg has much more detail on https://dq.yam.com/post.php?id=9497. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Does indeed appear to be a bad Panoramio user. --Majora (talk) 00:32, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]