Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with bvmLQWbaOtY
Screenshots from City Club of Cleveland debate
[edit]The source YouTube link is not licensed as CC, as claimed.
- File:Jeff Johnson 2017-08-25.jpg
- File:Bill Patmon 2017-08-25.jpg
- File:Bill Patmon 2017-08-25 (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:27, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- Videos from City Club of Cleveland used to be tagged Creative Commons at time of upload. They changed to a different license at some point since then. I have no way of proving this, so please delete all photos from Category:City Club of Cleveland. Roseohioresident (talk) 04:41, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- As the CEO of the City Club, I can confirm that those videos are no longer under Creative Commons licenses. They are copyrighted by City Club and ideastream and should be deleted. --DM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danmoulthrop (talk • contribs) 16:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Danmoulthrop: Since you admit they were once released under creative commons, it seems you can not revoke that right, per Creative commons FAQ found here :
What if I change my mind about using a CC license?
CC licenses are not revocable. Once something has been published under a CC license, licensees may continue using it according to the license terms for the duration of applicable copyright and similar rights. As a licensor, you may stop distributing under the CC license at any time, but anyone who has access to a copy of the material may continue to redistribute it under the CC license terms. While you cannot revoke the license, CC licenses do provide a mechanism for licensors to ask that others using their material remove the attribution information. You should think carefully before choosing a Creative Commons license.
- So it would seem they should not be deleted. 216.66.55.75 00:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: we cannot prove the prior CC license. --JuTa 17:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)