Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zwarte Piet.jpg
I don't want this file to be online anymore, because of misuse. Radiominded (talk) 18:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Misuse on Wikimedia projects or outside? --Túrelio (talk) 22:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Outside of Wikimedia, for use against the wishes of the portraited person.--Radiominded (talk) 20:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Normally, I tend to accede to requests by the subject of the photo, but this was obviously posed, so the person certainly knew his photo was being taken, and the license isn't revocable, which is to say that even if we stop hosting it, uses outside of Wikimedia Foundation projects will still be legal. Given the issue you raise, wouldn't it make the most sense to add the {{Personality rights}} tag to the image, and keep it? - Jmabel ! talk 00:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Keep image is already released to PD, deletion in Commons wont diminish anyone's rights to do what ever they want to this picture. Besides really nice picture illustrating Zwarte Piet. --Justass (talk) 21:17, 26 November 2009 (UTC)- I'm the person who made this image. I placed it here without permission of the illustrated person. He asked me to delete it, because he doesn't want it to be online here, because people started using the picture against his will. He didn't knew it was online here. --Radiominded (talk) 15:41, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- OK that's at least given us some reason for removal apart from the photographer's change of mind. If the subject actively objects, it might be reasonable for us to accede to their wishes. Also I think we may have had issues with personality rights laws in the Netherlands in the past. --Simonxag (talk) 01:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Delete The person in question never agreed to this photo being presented online, despite the licencing. We're nice people, right? It's a great photo, but I'm sure we can find a replacement—it's not that big of a deal. — Lasse Havelund (p) (t) 14:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete
_________________
Deleted/Uploader reqested.--Fanghong (talk) 02:19, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Professonal picture without any metadata of unknown origin no author given uncertainty about copyright status due to lack of data MoiraMoira (talk) 05:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC) I have updated the description. Hausofmakeup (talk) 13:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC) Please, remove this picture. Zwartmaker (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since). Previously subject to DR and history split, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep If the original license was valid. --RAN (talk) 02:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
-2022-07-01T02:05:00.000Z-King_of_Hearts-2022-06-30T05:45:00.000Z){kind=link}
- Delete The persons in the picture are recognizable. There is no indication of their permission to use it with a free license, in fact, there are indications they object to it on legally valid grounds. MarcoSwart (talk) 08:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Keep I can understand why the people in the photograph would want it deleted. That said, they don't own the copyright. Nor does Commons need the permission of models to host images featuring them. That's just my opinion though. Someone else could probably go a completely different way with it, but I do think deleting an image just because a person in said image has a problem with it being hosted on Commons could set a bad precedent. Especially if it's just because some stupid people online are misusing the image, which obviously isn't Commons' problem. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:20, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Dutch copyright is applicable and "portrait rights" are part of Dutch copyright law. MarcoSwart (talk) 08:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
