Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yellow betta splendens.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Pixabay's CC0 license was removed since January 2019, image published after that are not accepted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: , do we have evidence of that? -- Blackcat
14:23, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Blackcat: You may see {{Pixabay}} and Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/01#Pixabay license renewal--A1Cafel (talk) 14:35, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: , yes, but there's also this: another change of policy? -- Blackcat 14:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Blackcat: Please read https://pixabay.com/service/terms/#license: The Pixabay license doesn't allow "Sale or distribution of Content as digital Content or as digital wallpapers (such as on stock media websites)", which implies a non-commercial restriction, and this fails COM:L--A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, @A1Cafel: , but I read in the same article: Under the Pixabay License you are granted an irrevocable, worldwide, non-exclusive and royalty free right to use, download, copy, modify or adapt the Content for commercial or non-commercial purposes, then The Pixabay License does not allow: Sale or distribution of Content as digital Content or as digital wallpapers. So it seems to say two opposite things in the same article, am I missing something? -- Blackcat 15:04, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, @A1Cafel: , but I read in the same article: Under the Pixabay License you are granted an irrevocable, worldwide, non-exclusive and royalty free right to use, download, copy, modify or adapt the Content for commercial or non-commercial purposes, then The Pixabay License does not allow: Sale or distribution of Content as digital Content or as digital wallpapers. So it seems to say two opposite things in the same article, am I missing something? -- Blackcat
- @Blackcat: Please read https://pixabay.com/service/terms/#license: The Pixabay license doesn't allow "Sale or distribution of Content as digital Content or as digital wallpapers (such as on stock media websites)", which implies a non-commercial restriction, and this fails COM:L--A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: , yes, but there's also this: another change of policy? -- Blackcat
- @Blackcat: You may see {{Pixabay}} and Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/01#Pixabay license renewal--A1Cafel (talk) 14:35, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Not the best legal drafting I have seen, but it differentiates between using an image, perhaps in an ad, which is permitted, and selling the image for use by the buyer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
