Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wassila Hachchi.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong title, the person in the photo is someone else. This photo can be removed. Ter-burg (talk) 14:10, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it better to find out who really are on the photo? They may be interesting for Commons. Apdency (talk) 19:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the title, the description and the categories. "Wassilla Hachci" is wiped out everywhere, except for a redirect. I don't think there's a reason to delete the picture now. Commons has hundreds of pictures with unknown people. Apdency (talk) 09:05, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's a great solution too, thank you for changing the title. Trying to find out who the person is might be difficult. Ter-burg (talk) 13:44, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply. I started a quest in the Dutch village pump. Kind regards, Apdency (talk) 14:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support deletion especially because the author agrees; the photograph is subject to Dutch portretrecht. Probably the people are not even relevant if the even the photographer does not know their names.
Kind regards from Zeeburg,  Klaas `Z4␟` V05:58, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's better to read the whole history of this discussion, not just its start. The author, Sebastiaan ter Burg, now agrees with keeping it, as we can read here and here. Also what he says here above, (13:44, 7 March 2018) points in that direction. Apdency (talk) 07:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Read personality rights. BTW the lady is very likely not a notable person so what is the reason to keep her picture here with the risk it's going to be used for promotional purpose? Klaas `Z4␟` V05:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We'll see the administrator decision. Apdency (talk) 07:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 09:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]