Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unidad para Chile.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Unidad para Chile.png

[edit]

The copihue shape is complex enough to be copyrighted. Also it's not the own work of uploader Bedivere (talk) 15:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the Licensing section to be more in line with other logos of similar complexity and context of use. I consulted with the pact if I could sub go their logo to Wikipedia and they showed no problems.
Considering how other logos of Chilean political organizations are cataloged on Wikipedia, and adding that both the copihue and the star are patriotic symbols freely used in Chile, this logo should not be subject to copyright.
I attach examples of Chilean political logos with similar complexity that are not subject to copyright:
- The Chile Vamos logo and its characteristic star (also used in derivatives such as Vamos por Chile).
- The star of Renovación Nacional
- The star and disc of Partido de la Gente
- The shield with the phalanx of the Christian Democrats
- The logo of the Humanist party
- The bullet, with a check and reflection of Lista del Apruebo
- Finally, the logo of the Acción Popular Independiente, a copihue without copyright.
With all this information on the table, I ask you to reconcider your deletion request. Fhguiñez (talk) 12:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The copihue is still a complex shape and may be eligible for copyright. Please remember that the much simpler "Estamos bien en el refugio los 33" paper is copyrighted in Chile. Bedivere (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I ask you to please explain in more detail or attach references. It is not enough to repeat the same statement over and over again.
The fact that the paper of the miners is copyrighted does not mean that any paper with a similar composition has it, the context in which it was produced is equally or more important. I have listed a long list of logos of the same context as Unidad para Chile (chilean political organizations) and similar complexity that are not copyrighted.
That gives us a fairly clear jurisprudential framework, which indicates that the logo in question should not be copyrighted either.
If you do not have any additional information that is relevant to the point of discussion, then it seems prudent to consider this matter clarified. Fhguiñez (talk) 17:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Claro que lo que dije es pertinente al tema discutido; que a tí no te guste el argumento, está bien; que otros logotipos que probablemente igual estarían protegidos no hayan sido borrados, también está bien; lo que se está discutiendo aquí es este logotipo, el de Unidad para Chile. En Chile el umbral de originalidad es bastante bajo, si se considera que el texto de los mineros, que básicamente son unas palabras escritas con plumón y sin la más absoluta intención de originalidad artística, creativa, etc., recibió protección bajo la ley de propiedad intelectual al ser registrada en la institución correspondiente (DPI). Eso permite sugerir que otras creaciones un tantito más creativas que aquella, como el logotipo en discusión, sí pueden estar protegidas por la ley de propiedad intelectual. El diseño del copihue es suficientemente complejo como para ser protegido; las letras, no creo. Podría mantenerse el logotipo si se prescinde del copihue. Bedivere (talk) 19:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Unidad_para_Chile.png&oldid=733272883"