Commons:Deletion requests/File:Triptych of the crucified Martyr (infra-red reflectography).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Triptych of the crucified Martyr (infra-red reflectography).jpg

I wonder if this can still be called a faithful reproduction of a 2 dimensional art object. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

 Keep There is nothing original in this image that could possibly constitute a new work. It was created using an automated process that takes scans in the infrared bandwidth of light. See here. De728631 (talk) 22:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Maybe, but the Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp jurisprudence does not apply here. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 11:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Why should it not apply, and who do you think would possibly own the copyright of the derivative work? De728631 (talk) 22:14, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

It is not a faithful reproduction of a 2 dimensional art object, because, among other things, there are two figures visible that are not in the painting. The copyright is owned by the one who gave the order to make this picture. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

 Keep Under European or U.S. law, there is no intellectual property created when photographs are taken in a chosen spectrum of light (such as narrow visible bandwidths, ultraviolet or infrared) and are intended to be a 'faithful reproduction'. A non-reflective scan such as penetrative UHF models, may be more difficult to determine whether the outcome is potentially copyrightable as a new creative work. --Fæ (talk) 23:08, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

---

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 15 March 2016 (UTC)