Commons:Deletion requests/File:Takasakiseikyoukai4.JPG
An infringement of the right of likeness, and not permitted to upload the files to Wikimedia Commons by the administrator(priest) of the church. And the Author Tsubasabbs permits it deleted from Wkimedia Commons. Kinno Angel (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)His permission to delete is here.--Kinno Angel (talk) 17:40, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Delete 依頼者票 at my request
- Delete same reason with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Takasakiseikyoukai3.JPG. --Kinori (talk) 11:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason to delete, correctly licensed, see also the other DR Jcb (talk) 22:56, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
An infringement of the right of likeness, and not permitted to upload the files to Wikimedia Commons by the administrator(priest) of the church. And the Author Tsubasabbs permits it deleted from Wkimedia Commons. His permission to delete is here. This photo includs the person who is not clergy. And the faces can be recognized. Kinno Angel (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep - a church service is a public place (I reverted the other nomination, because you nominated the talk page instead of the image) - Jcb (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- It's not a place where photography is traditionally permitted, though. There is a certain expectation of privacy during a church service there wouldn't be in a mall or any place not frequented only by a specific narrow group organized for a specific narrow purpose.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:14, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Keep for the reason given by Jcb. Tag the photograph with {{Personality}} if this has not yet been done. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 17:55, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- DeleteIn Japan, Chritsians are extremely few(1% among the state). Some do not want to reveal their belief. Church service is not public place in Japan, and it is easy to recognize individual person as his belief in Japan. Tsubasabbs did not get their permission. Grave legal problem(infringement of the right of likeness, and PRIVACY), and in Japanese Wikipedia, its problem has been recognized as grave legal problem[1] [2].--Kinno Angel (talk) 23:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- (comment)
- I argue against Kinno-Angel's opinion.
- 1) Japan has little population of the Christian, but the number of christian church members does not matter. A church service is a public place in country in the world of any place. Because, regardless of a denomination, the body of Christ is ONE anywhere in the world.
- 2) Tsubasabbs did not get their permission. I object to his opinion and without grounds. I took permission to this Priest and photographed it. A right of likeness and the privacy observe it for Japan Law. --Tsubasabbs (talk) 14:48, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- I took permission to this Priest and photographed it.
- Is permission to put to the public granted? I asked it many times! You have not answered it yet. You agreed with deleting in jawp, but you did not do so here. You cheated community of jawp.--Kinno Angel (talk) 23:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Comment At first, in 1969 Japanese supreme court said "everyone have freedom from being unnecessary photographed" in streets as a constitutional right(最判S44.12.24 刑集23.12.1625). Even in definitional "public space", streets it is illegal to take a picture of a person without a valid reason. Therefore the "public space" theory is not enough reason to photograph a person in Japan.- Second, a chapel is not public space, I think. At least it is not as public as streets. And this picture is took at panikhida. I mean it is not just a sunday service, but a service for closed people.
- Third, the old man in right of this image isn't a priest. He is just a altar server. He may have a secular job, non Christian coworkers and customers. We have to be more careful with his privacy and reputation.--mizusumashi 21:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I cast a Keep vote once, but cancel it. There is the reason that you must delete by all means for Kinno-Angel. I lost his passion. I want to respect his opinion this time. --Tsubasabbs (talk) 12:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I've written my opinion above.--mizusumashi 15:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per COM:PEOPLE since there is no expectation of photography during this church's services, and apparently the author did not obtain permission to distribute this. The author now supports deletion. --99of9 (talk) 12:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
