Commons:Deletion requests/File:Snapchat logo.svg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Snapchat logo.svg

Does this meet the threshold of originality? Moving thread from COM:UNDEL. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Originally file was deleted by User:Jcb for Missing permission as of 22 September 2016.

Not having seen what this file looks like, but I can only assume what I think it looks like from filename. Probably similar one of these:

• https://www.snapchat.com/images/brand-guidelines/brand-logo-yellow.svg
• https://www.snapchat.com/images/brand-guidelines/branding-logos.png

These examples are well below the threshold of originality to be eligible for copyright. Does this upload qualify for {{PD-textlogo}}? 80.221.159.67 00:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Delete - the logo is IMHO not below TOO - Jcb (talk) 00:25, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Delete I think that would qualify for U.S. copyright. It's not a simple, common shape. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

 Neutral as nominator. I believe this is borderline if not below threshold of originality. 80.221.159.67 03:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

 Comment If deleted, the other versions should be deleted as well:

• File:Snapchat Logo.png
• File:SnapchatLogo.png
• File:Snapchat-large.jpg (tagged illegitimately as self, CC BY-SA 4.0)

I'm nominating them for deletion as well and including them in this deletion request. 80.221.159.67 03:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

@INeverCry: You have protected SnapchatLogo.png on Commons from anonymous edits. 80.221.159.67 03:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

I protected File:Snapchat Logo.png. The edit history speaks for itself as regards the protection. I would prefer the protection were left in place until/if this gets deleted. It can be discussed here by anyone. The protection won't interfere with a keep or delete action either. INeverCry 04:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

 Comment: As for the SVG source code itself, it has been drawn in a vector editor and not by hand in a text editor. Therefore, I don't think there to be sufficient creative expression in the source code itself. My question remains about the image output itself. 80.221.159.67 09:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

---

Deleted: Per discussion. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)