Commons:Deletion requests/File:Siduri's Advice.webm
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Small size file uploaded as part of a promotional or self-promotional series, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:SidurisAdvice.webm Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bible-of-Siduri.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:LoveSiduri.jpg. Unused and outside of COM:SCOPE, may be related to sock accounts, please see the other discussions. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:13, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- I would say delete here, as the uploader is almost certainly one of the many sock accounts of User:Jim-Siduri (blocked for multiple account abuse at en.wiki), and the video is very unlikely to be his own personal copyright to release - and anyway, it's just another video of someone reading out the same thing. He's been using Wikipedia/media to promote the "Church of Siduri" for some time, but he's woefully clueless about copyright - and he goes off on diversions of obfuscation including the creation of multiple throw-away accounts whenever anyone tries to help him. Until he gets some clue about copyright and the proper way to release and upload media here, I don't think it's safe to keep his stuff. Neatsfoot (talk) 16:43, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Having checked the hosting requirements here some more, I think this tiny low-quality video fails COM:EDUSE. Neatsfoot (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- @Jimmy_Wales This is just cruel? What did she do wrong? How is a free User-created video of "Siduri's Advice" not relevant to the WP Siduri page? This is exactly the type of multimedia content Wikipedia needs in its future. Why are we being so tough on these girls? Everything has been released by the church, this girls made it herself, what other loops do we need to jump through??? 166.137.8.51 00:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- The uploader, User:Video-fan-clubs-for-Wiki, claims it as their own work, yet you are saying it has been released by the church? How can the church release it if User:Video-fan-clubs-for-Wiki made it? Or did "this girls" make it as you now claim? If that's the case, how could it have been User:Video-fan-clubs-for-Wiki's own work? Jim, User:Video-fan-clubs-for-Wiki is another of your accounts, and it's already been blocked as a sock, and by now claiming the video belongs to the church or the girls, you are simply confirming the lie you told when you uploaded it as your own work. Neatsfoot (talk) 15:28, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- (Oh, and to any strolling admins, 166.137.8.51 is clearly User:Jim-Siduri evading his block.) Neatsfoot (talk) 15:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Jimmy_Wales This is just cruel? What did she do wrong? How is a free User-created video of "Siduri's Advice" not relevant to the WP Siduri page? This is exactly the type of multimedia content Wikipedia needs in its future. Why are we being so tough on these girls? Everything has been released by the church, this girls made it herself, what other loops do we need to jump through??? 166.137.8.51 00:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Delete In what way does this, or any of the Church of Siduri material meet COM:SCOPE?
- Besides the side issues of the sockpuppeting and the creepy stalking. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 6 October 2014 (UTC)