Commons:Deletion requests/File:Share-a-fact-highlighted text.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Share-a-fact-highlighted text.jpg

[edit]

Given source is obviously missleading (image hosting service, which is not the source of the wikipedia article), authors of the used wikipedia article are not named and CC-by-sa-4.0 is not the licence for wikipedia text. Same problems with the image in the background. Thats a legal catastrophe. Deletion would be safest solution, if the uploader does not fix the major problems himself. Don-kun (talk) 15:53, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for File:Ui share fact 1.png and File:Ui share fact 2.png. Shame on WMF for uploading such obvious violations of the copyright of the users.. --Don-kun (talk) 15:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I second that: The responsible party has to provide the correct information or the files have to disappear. @WMF: Office action, anyone? → «« Man77 »» [de] 16:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nomination. Yellowcard (talk) 16:39, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Wrong licence and source/author.--CennoxX (talk) 16:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
should be done.--CennoxX (talk) 21:42, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Please do not delete: Thanks for pointing out the missing credits for this file. As the original uploader of this file, I have now added the missing attribution and license credits. Therefore, I do not think this file should be considered for deletion anymore, as outlined in <my longer comment on my talk page and a request page>. Please let me know if you think any other information is needed — or remove the deletion notice from the file page. Thank you.ASherman (WMF) (talk) 23:43, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You need to provide a source link to the image you reused and to the article you quoted per COM:L#License information. You should research the authors who wrote the quoted text from the version history of the article. --AFBorchert (talk) 05:04, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I completely understand your concern. Each "Description" section of the photos had a link to the Strasbourg article image attached to the word "Photo" in the second line. I have now changed this to the title of the Strasbourg image so the link is more visible and still available for readers. As for the article text, we are checking with legal on whether to attribute the highlighted text from the article. However it seems unusual and not practical. ASherman (WMF) (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, as the text is still not attributed at all. As a side remark, I sincerely hope that the view that text attribution and licensing is "unusual and not practical" is neither meant to be understood literally nor the official position of the WMF.--Cirdan (talk) 18:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You have uploaded this file to Wikimedia Commons and you are thereby bound to the policies of this project, among them COM:L. If you chose to ignore this, it will be most likely deleted even if you consider these requirements as “unusual and not practical”. Please understand that we are also concerned about the risks of potential reusers outside of WMF projects. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All images should now have a link to the Strasbourg Wikipedia article and its edit history; within the image "Description" section. For further discussion or questions please visit the talk page linked HERE. ASherman (WMF) (talk) 20:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You should thank CennoxX for this work which would have been your obligation. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I really appreciate all the insight and help through this process. Thank you so much CennoxX.ASherman (WMF) (talk) 21:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User:ASherman (WMF), is it correct to assume that you will integrate this feature into the app ASAP?--Cirdan (talk) 07:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This question and others can be answered by User:Slaporte (WMF) on his talk page.ASherman (WMF) (talk) 16:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OK now. Yann (talk) 19:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Share-a-fact-highlighted_text.jpg&oldid=156907388"