Commons:Deletion requests/File:Severni park (4).JPG

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Severni park (4).JPG

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the park is a modern architectural work.[1] Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

I don't think trees and grass are protected. --Sporti (talk) 09:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Their overall arrangement is a protected work of landscape architecture (Article 5, line 9). See also this article (pp. 64-66). --Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:17, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Overall arrangement is more complex than a path with some trees. Also your source says the work on the park is not finnished yet. --Sporti (talk) 10:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Which source? Parts of architectural works are protected too. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Source [1] "Ljubljana - Kdaj bo dokončno urejen Severni park za gospodarskim razstaviščem, na Mestni občini Ljubljana (MOL) še ne vedo, pa tudi povsem jasno ni, kakšen bo njegov dokončni obseg."--Sporti (talk) 10:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

What influence do you think this could have on the copyright status of the depicted part of the park? It has been designed upon an (architectural) plan. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

 Keep Any copyrightable element of design that may be visible in this photo is de minimis here. — Yerpo ^Eh? 09:34, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

 Delete Obviously an instance of conterporary landscape design, which is a subpartition of architecture. Even if it might be not extraordinary original. Shaqspeare (talk) 13:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

---

Deleted: There is no FOP in Slovenia FASTILY 22:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)