Commons:Deletion requests/File:Royal Heraldry Banner the Catholic Monarchy (1556-1700).svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid source information. The elements have different representations at the source files. It's well established that representations of a heraldry element, when above COM:TOO, have separate copyright. The elements as used in this file have no source. Compare e.g. the yellow lion with the ones in the indicated source files. Jcb (talk) 16:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you read the Gospel of Saint Matthew? Chapter 7... speck of sawdust... This is same thing. There are hundreds files without naming their origin and by for a few details of mine. My work have sources and it's contrasted. Search others upload files indiscriminately. Thanks --Parair (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am a theologian, you don't need to lecture me on the Bible. Now back to this file, the fact that others violate copyright does not entitle you to do the same. Jcb (talk) 21:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
False! I didn't break copyright. Everything is taken of Wikimedia commons (user:Heralder or user:Sodacan), or, of course, it make for me. Thanks for take a break in your studies for my case. --Parair (talk) 23:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Till now, I have not seen any sources for those elements. You have to indicate from which files at Commons the elements originate. Till now you have, apart from your own uploads, only refered to files with different representations of those elements. Jcb (talk) 23:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. Next time I have to upload a video tutorial for clear my work. It will be that I read wrong theologians. --Parair (talk) 11:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source provided. DR of a source needn't to be an exact copy of that source. Ankry (talk) 12:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In this case yes, the sources of the elements need to be the same version as used in these file. It's well established that individual representations of a heraldry element have separate copyright. The elements as currently used in the nominated files are unsourced and there is no indication at all that those representations are under a free license. In fact the uploader is around and refuses to tell us where the used elements come from, which is an indication that these elements are probably copyright violations. Jcb (talk) 15:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 02:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]