Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ponte Morandi crollato.jpeg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright issues: Screenshot from copyrighted Material / non cc-licenced youtube-movie 89.204.155.102 06:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
{{Vote speedykeep}}Trolling IP.The video is licensed on YouTube with CC license, and has already been license-reviewed. --Ruthven (msg) 07:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy keep Just uploaded a better screenshot from the same video. It's on Youtube with CC license and has already been verified--Daolr (talk) 09:27, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Delete came from a YouTube channel that is full of stolen content, also includes two different videos of the same event. @Wdwd: as reviewer please comment.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)- Delete per arguments by user BevinKacon. -Mardus /talk 17:07, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Comment I don't see any proof that the video is part of "stolen content" (stolen from who?), and since it has been published under Creative Commons I really don't see the point--Daolr (talk) 05:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Daolr: Well, the uploads of that account are for advertising. If it would have been a TV channel, it would have been completely different… Maybe Wdwd that reviewed the license can double check it and he/we can try to find the original video (if it exists). --Ruthven (msg) 17:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- You mean license laundering? 84.250.17.211 08:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- checked the CC-license status on YT -> cc license. I have no indications for license laundering and in my opinion it seems to be okay. If there is some information about some kind of license laundering like other sources of this video, with different/incompatible license, please specify more details.--Wdwd (talk) 16:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Keep As the work doesn't exist anymore, there is no copyright to be defended. Italian law makes the difference from the architectural work itself (for which copyright expires once the building is destroyed) and the blueprints (for which copyright holds for 70 years after the author's death). Besides, from comment above, the video seems to be fine wrt free licensing.--Ruthven (msg) 14:23, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP - author unclear. — Racconish 💬 10:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
