Commons:Deletion requests/File:Picture of the penis of a circumcised man.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the image is inaccurate and not clear to the viewer, and because the background lighting and the image are not clear Redfox6600 (talk) 18:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 14:57, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture should be deleted because it is not clear the photography and the background lighting of the picture is not good and because this picture is not educational 2001:1670:8:ED5A:D4E3:6ED9:FFBA:BCA8 06:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The image is not clear due to the reflection of the shooting light on the camera 2001:1670:C:FEBD:A9BD:25F9:A601:C75 16:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per previous keep. Better quality than most "penis selfies". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I request to delete this image because it is not clear and it is in my previous account, which I do not use and I have new images on my new account, which is Redfox2003 Redfox2003 (talk) 09:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Quality issues were addressed in the previous requests; the fact that it was uploaded by an old account is not a valid reason. Brianjd (talk) 09:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, even the uploader admitted that the image is useful and of good quality. Brianjd (talk) 09:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep This image was previously kept twice and has good quality. Tm (talk) 12:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is not appropriate because it belongs to the penis of a teenager who has not reached the legal age 2001:1670:8:67FA:14EC:8A8A:4924:AD32 19:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


A startling claim suggesting anon either is the subject of the photo or has intimate knowledge about them. I suggest you present your specific evidence proving this allegation privately, email as detailed at COM:VRT. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]