Commons:Deletion requests/File:Oud Drimmelen Oud Drimmelen 9 Boerderij woonhuis.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a monument anymore. It is a rebuild house. There is no information on which building style, period etc.Adding to this, the former owner has ripped off several people with his dog breeding company. Still, people visit me and my family and threaten us. When we explain that we are new owners, they don't believe us always. We try to get our adress and pictures of our house offline as much as possible because the former owner has his own website and still has pictures of our house online. Therefore, I kindly request to take this picture offline. I can add pictures (owned by me, taken by the former owners family) of this house from the 1950's when desired. Den Engelsen (talk) 08:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, it is very unpleasant what happens to Den Engelsen in their house. However, I do not envisage why removing the photo from Commons would help to solve the problem. The house can be seen here, here and on Google streetview. The building can be seen from the road as the photo shows. On request through VRT I revised the photo and now this reason is given to remove the photo. I do not see the need to delete this photo. Ellywa (talk) 14:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please note this other request to delete the photo. What is the real reason I ask? Ellywa (talk) 20:37, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
At least someone should remove the older version. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 22:46, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: current version; old version Deleted, per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]