Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ottomans, Shaybanids, Safavids, Mamluks in 1510.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not own work. The style is vastly different from their other "own work" map, which there are even more red flags of not being their own work [1]. In other words, possibly copyrighted as well. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear user "HistoryofIran",
1) You claim is baseless. You are trying to prevent this map from appearing on the public platform only because it illustrates Shaybanid Empire during with greater territory than Safavids, to which you are biased in this situation.
2) Once you claim that it is not my own work, then the burden of proof is on the accuser! I can declare that it is only my own work! Any claim to question its authenticity will face a clear burden of proof! The same applies to copyright accusation! On my part, I would be more than happy to meet any arguments challenging it authenticity, because I am more than sure that it is my own work!
What makes it map unique and valuable for historical cartography?
1) It provides a unique glimpse at the more realistic geographical extents of Muslim powers in West Asia in 1510.
2) Not a single previous map could accurately depict the territorial expansion of early Shaybanids (1500-1510)
3) The map also allows us to look at the overall geopolitical situation in Muslim world.
I assume the claims of the user "HistoryofIran" do not correspond to the scientific objectivity and it is based on bias towards preventing any map with weaker position of Persian sultanates. Hence, I firmly believe that the unsupported claims of this user cannot and will not challenge the authenticity of this scientific contribution. Nelsito Maduro (talk) 18:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ranting and attacking me is not going to help. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear user "HistoryofIran" or "Mellk" "Bbb23", your claims have been clearly addressed in my previous reply. If you have a convincing evidence, you are more than welcome to bring it out here in support of your claims. Once you fail to deliver the proof of your claim, then your words have no convincing power. The manner you communicate here doesn't correspond to the cooperative principles of academic discussion. If you have any proof, bring it and try to articulate what exactly is disturbing you about the file. So far, you have failed to bring out any convincing proof. Nelsito Maduro (talk) 15:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you continue attacking me, I can just as easily report you in Wikimedia Commons as I did in Wikipedia. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear user "HistoryofIraq" or "Mellk",
Kindly engage your skills in a discussion and bring out your arguments and proofs to support your accusations instead of threating. It does not help. So far you have failed to deliver any logical reasoning to back your accusations. Once again I have to remind you that this platform does not run on your personal intuitions.
Once again, kindly engage in a discussion, and provide more convincing proofs. Nelsito Maduro (talk) 12:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And reported. HistoryofIran (talk) 03:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:20, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]