Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nudist girl.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Flickr source says: "Sometimes The Bikinis Come Off Particularly on the boat." So this was taken in a private place. Also, subject is not famous or anything, just a girl, image would have been deleted as "Commons is not for your vacation photos" if she had had some clothes on. 95.199.16.147 23:18, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep - this doesn't appear to have been taken on a boat to me, looks more like a lagoon. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)- Keep, agree that it indeed appears to be a lagoon. -- Cirt (talk) 02:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Delete Seems to be an isolated place. I think the case could be made that there was an expectation of privacy, so it should be deleted in accordance with COM:PEOPLE. Handcuffed (talk) 01:50, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Comment - This is not offensive, seen worse on discovery channel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.168.177.25 (talk • contribs)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 23:45, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Photo d'un modèle potentiellement mineur (image à caractère pédophile) 2.5.229.82 14:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Image clearly of a adult, as you could saw if you werent trying to dig and find images to play the pedhopile card. Or you have a preverted mind (be it of religious extremism or any other extremism) to see pedhopile in a clearly adult nude model. Tm (talk) 15:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep There's not really any reason to think this young women is less than 18. And even if was the case, let's recall that underage nudity is not always a source of pedophilia (I'd also say there's some kind of perversion to think so). There are many examples of acceptable children nudity on Commons, especially when it comes to treat subjects like nudism, which is not a question of perversion nor pedophilia, or ethnographic subjects (yeah, let's not forget that nudity is a form of taboo in our occidental societies - and other societies like the arab-muslim world - but is considered differently by other cultures !). In this case, it's clearly an illustration of nudism. Therefore no problem. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 07:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
