Commons:Deletion requests/File:NEW WIKIPEDIA LOGO NEW.JPG
Out of scope. Apparently it was uploaded on the English Wikipedia as a proposal to replace Wikipedia's logo, which can be nothing but trolling. I see no potential educational use of this file. Nardog (talk) 17:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, still in use in talk page archive. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Obvious nonsense/troll that English Wikipedia didn't want back in 2007. I've no idea what purpose moving this to Commons ten years later(!!) was meant to serve, all that did is make it our problem was well as theirs. Technically, this is in use at the en.wikipedia discussion (which strongly rejected it), but I'm not sure that actually counts. Ubcule (talk) 12:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete. Previous deletion discussion was closed in error; images which are only used in talk pages are specifically not protected by COM:INUSE. Omphalographer (talk) 17:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer: Thanks for the link, and yes, for the record, it reads:-
- If an image is in use on another project (aside from use on talk pages or user pages), that is enough for it to be within scope.
- Emphasis on the exception in bold.
- I'd have been more surprised if merely referencing something in order to discuss if they wanted it kept and deciding they didn't(!) would have forced it to be kept.
- (Hadn't noticed this had been previously nominated either. Now that I think of it, I'm slightly surprised that we don't already have some sort of automatic notice before submission to draw cases like that to an (inadvertent) re-nominator's attention, but that's another issue).
- Ubcule (talk) 22:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer: Thanks for the link, and yes, for the record, it reads:-
- Delete per above. - Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
