Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miss Butterfly.ogv
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This is pornography, which doesn't belong on this site, even if it has historical value. Fabrice Florin (WMF) (talk) 06:38, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Keep In use in es.wikipedia.org in es:Cine pornográfico and in ne.wikipedia.org in ne:अश्लिल चलचित्र, so this file is automatically in scope. Also this file as historical value and Wikimedia Commons is not censored and Commons has a scope in pornographic materials and this file inserts in said scope, as even en.wikipedia.org as a article about this and other old pornographic movies in en:The Good Old Naughty Days, the es.wikipedia.org in es:Polissons et galipettes and fr.wikipedia.org in fr:Polissons et galipettes. Tm (talk) 11:45, 8 July 2013 (UTC)- Comment: Note that this is only one of a series of similar clips. Also note prior deletion discussion for another clip from the same film. --Andreas JN466 01:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep We have no rule against pornography, and shouldn't have. darkweasel94 06:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep as per the others' comments. Absolutely in scope. Handcuffed (talk) 09:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Yes, it does belong on this site, absolutely. Historical value acknowledged by nominator, and that's all we need to keep. What doesn't belong on this site is cultural bias and censorship. --Cyclopia (talk) 10:00, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, the only criteria in this case for deletion would be if it was under copyright. nominator needs to understand that there is no censorship of content here. we do have protected files which have been used in an inappropriate way, but i believe those are all images, no films or audio files. If the content of a video was particularly transgressive of social norms, i could see us adding it to the list of carefully watched images, but i dont think this qualifies (i have not watched it)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:00, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Kept per all comments other than nominator. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Commons nie jest amatorską stroną pornograficzną 188.147.12.36 21:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)