Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ljubljana (2763355555).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the architecture and the door would be in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 06:57, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The building seems to be from the time period before 1890, since it looks like typical neo-renaissance architecture. However we don't know the name of the architect and with some (quite small) probablity he might have lived even until about 1950. Shaqspeare (talk) 09:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What about the decoration of the door? --Eleassar (t/p) 09:58, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What about common sense? --Sporti (talk) 10:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your common sense is not reliable evidence. It isn't even reliable, much less evidence. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If we know where this particular building in stands, we will be able to check when it has been built. E.g. to see on historical cadastre maps of Laibach. If it has been constructed before 1860, it would have been pretty clear PD: 1860 minus age of a undersign-authorised architect >24 = <=1836. Then the architect would have to live more than 106 years and we rather would have heard about him. The maybe even simplier possibility is to find out who the architect was. Shaqspeare (talk) 12:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I'm not sure there is anything copyrightable here (it wouldn't be in the USA -- doors and other common elements are explicitly excluded from architectural copyright. Even if the door is, it is DM to the graffiti which is the subject of the image. Without the graffiti, this would be deleted as not useful. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:14, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The graffiti that has been claimed to be the subject of the image is copyrighted too. Per the copyright expert Miha Trampuž, who deals with copyright in art at the Copyright Agency of Slovenia, graffiti are copyrighted in Slovenia.[1] Eleassar (t/p) 09:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]