Commons:Deletion requests/File:LT Museum Depot (107698218).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LT Museum Depot (107698218).jpg

Freedom of panorama would not cover 2D artwork, such as a line diagram. UK standard of originality is fairly low. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment What exactly do you consider to be above the threshold of originality in this picture ? — Racconish^☎ 12:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

I felt that this was above threshold of orginality owing to the fact that specific design choices were made concerning the choice of typefaces, and line coloring, in it's construction. However if you think they aren't significant enough. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Keep The only thing that could be considered original is what you call the construction, the way the network is represented. But here we have a simple fork which cannot realistically be claimed to be original. — Racconish^☎ 14:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

---

Deleted: It is well established that the Tube map is copyrighted. Similar maps such as this are also copyrighted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)