Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kit body inter0910h.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The logo's are DW Huib talk 16:34, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep, the only logo that could be eligible for copyright is so tiny that I cannot even say what it is (so de minimis surely applies). The Pirelli and Nike logos are ineligible, as well as the Italian flag. –Tryphon☂ 17:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete DW. --Simo82 (talk) 11:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)- Keep That is not a logo- it's a small yellow splodge. J Milburn (talk) 21:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I'm with the others in that I think it's too small to qualify as copyright-able. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The file was nominated for speedy deletion with the reason derivative work which uses the copyrighted, non-free, logo of Pirelli , I changed the speedy in a normal DR to get more input. Huib talk 08:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - de minimis - Huib talk 08:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. We already discussed this. Not only is it de minimis, but the Pirelli logo is {{PD-textlogo}} anyway. –Tryphon☂ 09:09, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Cloudz679 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unnecessary display of sponsor logos Yann (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with the nominator, but as the previous DR was closed as kept, I reopen the discussion.
- To me, this is either out of scope, or a copyvio. If it is acceptable just because it is very small, then it is a kind of fair use rationale, and this is not accepted on Commons. Yann (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- For me it is quite clearly the "Pirelli" logo, which is a copyrighted image and would therefore be "fair-use" which is not allowed on Commons. Looking at the file history I think it would be perfectly acceptable to keep the title as is, revert to a previous logo-free version and delete the version history where the logo exists. Cloudz679 (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- The rationale at this deletion request seems to be adequate in this case. Cloudz679 (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- For me it is quite clearly the "Pirelli" logo, which is a copyrighted image and would therefore be "fair-use" which is not allowed on Commons. Looking at the file history I think it would be perfectly acceptable to keep the title as is, revert to a previous logo-free version and delete the version history where the logo exists. Cloudz679 (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep as the display of "The Pirelli" and "Nike" logos are de minimis (if they are even eligible for copyright protection in the first place). LightGreenApple talk to me 21:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- If the logos are acceptable, I don't see why this should be so small. Yann (talk) 19:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- This is also a case of "Not educationally useful" per Deletion Policy - "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." Cloudz679 (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
