Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jewlian.jpg
No scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:27, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Active enwiki user with only two personal photos on his user page. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:19, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Im sorry, but you have not provided a scope for this image and therefore a reason for it to stay. Closes without a reasoned edit summary may some times be ok (when things are obvious), but this time certainly isn't. I also don't see how you could possibly consider this a "personal photo". Fry1989 eh? 14:16, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Keep Can be useful. Taivo (talk) 13:23, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Explain how. It looks like a conspiracy theorist crackpot concoction, and it doesn't even make sense as to what it's supposed to mean. Fry1989 eh? 19:51, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Exactly! This image illustrates en:Julian Assange arrest conspiracy theories! But I read the article about him and there was no mentions of conspiracy theories at all. If the conspiracy theories involving him are not as prominent as I thought earlier, maybe we do not need that image. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Care to explain how a photo of Assange with tape on his mouth, the Israeli flag, and a caption saying "Finally jewlian Abange? or Jewlian Dissange?" has any possible scope as an illustrative addition to "arrest conspiracy theories", a section that his en-Wiki article does not even have? I don't see it. There is no scope, this is absolute nonsense. Fry1989 eh? 16:42, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Exactly! This image illustrates en:Julian Assange arrest conspiracy theories! But I read the article about him and there was no mentions of conspiracy theories at all. If the conspiracy theories involving him are not as prominent as I thought earlier, maybe we do not need that image. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Delete In addition to having no educational use, it's also a very poor quality image and does not properly attribute File:Julian Assange cropped (Norway, March 2010).jpg, which it is derived from.--Atlantima (talk) 23:57, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- It troubles me that any admins wouldn't immediately recognize the deletability of this file, let alone close it as keep with such a nonsense reason.--Atlantima (talk) 02:13, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete If I am reading Commons:SCOPE#File in use in another Wikimedia project correctly, then simply being in used in user-space is not sufficient grounds to retain an image under the "someone is using it somewhere" provision. I fail to see what educational use this would ever have, no wiki-project or article should be adorned with something so amateurish and photoshopped, and arguably antisemitic. That an image is racist or offensive isn't itself grounds for deletion obviously, but where we're at is "realistic utility", of which this image has none. Tarc (talk) 13:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
