Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hosier Lane Melbourne-2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 14:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think it falls under 2D "works of artistic craftmanship" and Wikipedia has been inconsistent regarding deletion requests on Australian murals. I think we should pending our judgement until we reassess the case of FOP in Australia, especially street art, and produce a consistent policy across all deletion requests.
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama/AllRules#Australia
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/12#Concern_on_Australian_murals Kanzcech (talk) 02:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Kanzcech no, street art cannot be freely photographed for commercial licensing distributions. It is simple as that. The court ruling and the associated commentary only concern the threshold of objects (like a yacht that was the involved object in the court ruling) eligible for being a work of artistic craftsmanship or not. These do not in any way give indication, explicit or implicit-wise, that murals and other 2D artworks can be commercially exploited by the public without artists' permissions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
