Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gone with the Wind N64 video game screenshot.webp
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope: "screenshot" of a non-existant game. Unused and unlikely to be used. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep There are no other images in the "Fictional Video Games" category. There are very few free files dedicated to fictional works in general 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 09:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- There is another image now, and one which actually relates to a notable topic (w:Polybius (urban legend)). Omphalographer (talk) 21:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per first sentence above and also it seems to be the first potential illustration for AI art in retro video game style and for the concepts as well as maybe for things like AI tools for computer games (textures, 3D objects, video game fan art, etc). It was also popular on a subreddit, meaning it's additionally somewhat useful in regards to what the AI art community values. Oppose second sentence above, more files for fictional works would not be a good thing and aren't in itself aren't useful. However, since this is not a real game, the title should be changed. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Images of fictional things are generally in scope only if it is notable fiction, not some random fictional thing someone decided to make up. There is one other image in "Fictional Video Games" at present (which I have not examined), the category itself is only useful if there are free licensed images of *notable in-scope* fictional video games and does not need to be populated for the sake of populating it. Commons actually has a HUGE amount of free files dedicated to fictional works, and it seems absurd to claim otherwise - and such images are appropriate to have here when they are in scope for some reason (for example a notable work of fiction &/or work of a notable artist). This file is just poor quality junk. That it amused a few people on Reddit makes it fine for Reddit, but not for Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)- Delete Per Infrogmation. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
