Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gabinete 1.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 00:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - When I extracted a crop of this image and saw that the uploader had put it up as own work I figured it would be nominated for deletion pretty quickly. So, I took the liberty of researching the image. From what I can tell, the photograph cannot be found anywhere else on the internet which rules out it simply being an upload from some website. Further, when I copied the image onto an editing software to crop an image out of it, I found that it automatically flips vertically (This can be seen in the image's metadata). This, coupled with the very large image resolution (7,014 × 5,100 pixels) suggests that it's a scan from a physical photograph. Taking a look at the user, the only works they've ever uploaded were this image and another like it. The other photograph, File:Gabinete foto 2.jpg proves that both images were scanned from physical copies by the user (The far left of the image shows where the photograph cuts off and the printer lid is scanned instead). The photograph's description only says "Gabinete" which is Spanish for "Cabinet" meaning they probably are a native Spanish speaker which is in line with the country of origin. All of this leads me to believe that, while I doubt the user physically took the photograph in the 1980s, it probably is a genuine scan of a physical photograph owned by them or their family. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 03:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. COM:DW. Recent images, so not PD anyway. We need a permission from the original photographer. May be undeleted 50 years after publication, i.e. 2032, as it is probably a governement work. --Yann (talk) 09:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]