Commons:Deletion requests/File:Francesco altobelli.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Ondesonore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: violazione copyright. Valid-looking VRT ticket applies to the 2011 revisions, so Keep those. Why are the 2013 revisions copyright violations? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- For now I've reset to the 2011-image, as this is surely covered by the OTRS-permission. OTRS-request is pending. --Túrelio (talk) 16:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- the owner of the photos has requested the removal of all photos even older than 2011 for copyright violation Ondesonore (talk) 17:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- VRT note: the ticket dates 2011 and doesn't mention any future versions. Future versions are completely different from the original 2011 version so we should be having separate permissions for them. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 17:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for th fast research. So, we probably should delete the unsourced image-versions from 2013 and keep the 2 versions from 2011. --Túrelio (talk) 17:12, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes. That's everything I can tell in light of the ticket. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 17:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Newer images deleted. Ankry (talk) 20:43, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes. That's everything I can tell in light of the ticket. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 17:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for th fast research. So, we probably should delete the unsourced image-versions from 2013 and keep the 2 versions from 2011. --Túrelio (talk) 17:12, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- the owner of the photos has requested the removal of all photos even older than 2011 Ondesonore (talk) 17:45, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Ondesonore: they cannot withdraw what they permitted in the release. For instance, I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw from this agreement. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 17:50, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes Ondesonore (talk) 17:49, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- File not in use and received a new ticket for removal of the file, ticket:2022123010004698. Courtesy deletion applicable? — Tulsi 24x7 03:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Tulsi, as I noted above, they cannot withdraw from the agreement. They should be asked about it. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 06:15, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- mi sembra di essere stati molto chiari chiedendo la cancellazione per richiesta del diretto interessato Francesco Altobelli per violazione copyright i link associati alle immagini non sono neanche più attivi. Ondesonore (talk) 11:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Ondesonore: If the permission in ticket:2011050810006762 was not granted by the copyright holder, then the actual copyright holder probably needs to take a DMCA-based legal action. If it was granted by the copyright holder then nothing can be done. Ankry (talk) 20:43, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- mi sembra di essere stati molto chiari chiedendo la cancellazione per richiesta del diretto interessato Francesco Altobelli per violazione copyright i link associati alle immagini non sono neanche più attivi. Ondesonore (talk) 11:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Tulsi, as I noted above, they cannot withdraw from the agreement. They should be asked about it. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 06:15, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per VRT permission. The permission clearly states that it cannot be withdrawn (Riconosco che non posso ritirare questo accordo e che l'opera può o non può essere permanentemente conservata in uno dei progetti Wikimedia.). I recommend to Ondesonore to write to permissions-itwikimedia.org if they need a clarification in Italian. Ruthven (msg) 09:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)