Commons:Deletion requests/File:FlSt2old.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Originally nominated at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hornet Driver. Split into indivudal DR for independent discussion, if applicable. FastilyClone (talk) 04:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Keep: This is a perfectly good photo, well in scope. The only reason to delete it was a serious concern to assume bad faith from the uploader, based on the notion that the disparity of cameras and scanners reported in the EXIF data of his/her uploads implies copyright violation of third parties. That kind of concern cannot be evaluated in separate, isolated DRs such as this one, and indeed, upon exemplary (if seldom) questioning, the uploader proven to satisfaction personal authorship of most (if not all) uploads. No concievable reason to even file a separate DR for this one. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:23, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Withdrawn -FastilyClone (talk) 03:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This is a derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. It is a derivative of something that is in public domain: Therefore, keep. -- Tuválkin ✉ 19:35, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- On what basis are Swiss coats of arms in the public domain? The template {{PD-Coa-Switzerland}} appears to be based on {{PD-Switzerland-official}}, but it is not at all clear to me that coats of arms would be covered by {{PD-Switzerland-official}}. It is unclear whether a), c) and d) cover images or whether they only cover text. Similar provisions in the laws of other countries are inconsistent with regard to images contained within such documents. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- No idea on what basis, but then the issue to be solved is not about File:FlSt2old.jpg but about {{PD-Coa-Switzerland}}. If the latter is okay, then the former is too, if the latter is spurious, the former will be mass-deleted. No need for this separate DR. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:10, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- On what basis are Swiss coats of arms in the public domain? The template {{PD-Coa-Switzerland}} appears to be based on {{PD-Switzerland-official}}, but it is not at all clear to me that coats of arms would be covered by {{PD-Switzerland-official}}. It is unclear whether a), c) and d) cover images or whether they only cover text. Similar provisions in the laws of other countries are inconsistent with regard to images contained within such documents. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as per Tuválkin. Yann (talk) 08:30, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
