Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dr.Niklas.Lidströmer.CC.BY4.0.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This file was initially tagged by Riggwelter as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The given copyright license can not be verified. The only available source does not state any copyright information, nor the photographer's name. There is no indication that this is a free image.|url=https://nyheter.ki.se/molnbaserad-personlig-halsojournal-med-ai-ar-det-sakert King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- The only available online image is not identical with the here present image. If you look carefully the medallion on the wall behind is in the middle of the image in the Karolinska News image. And in the present image the medallion is to the right. The Karolinska News have now been alerted about the source and photo copyright info and will change the info online, in both the Swedish and English versions of the article. Please note that this photograph was taken by an unnamed photographer working for Springer Nature during the release of the book depicted in the image on 7 March 2022. The license accompanying the image explicitly states that it is under the CC BY 4.0 license (Creative Commons Attribution), which allows free use with appropriate attribution. The photograph will also be used in Nature Communications, Nature Medicine, and has already been featured in Karolinska News. Additionally, it will be included in an upcoming biography and in an article in the biannual magazine Arte et Marte this year. The license specifies 'photo: Springer Nature, Nature Portfolio' but does not name the photographer. GustenGast (talk) 08:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Fact remains: we can not verify your claim that this image is available under a free licence, i e compatible with a licence that Wikipedia can use, because you do not provide a proper and verifiable source. According to Swedish legislation, only the photographer can agree to the use of a free licence, no matter what Karolinska publishes on their web site. The EXIF data reveals that the image was taken on an iPhone 13 - I find it somewhat hard to believe that a professional photographer would use an iPhone to take official photographs (even if the quality isn't bad at all). Furthermore: the uploader, i e you, does not state where and how you got the photo in the first place. Riggwelter (talk) 13:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Riggwelter, as I have said I write a biography and I have contact but I am not employed by anyone in conflict with the family. There is no conflict of interest. GustenGast (talk) 16:58, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- The issue here is that we can not verify your claim that this image is available under a copyright licence that we can use on Wikipedia. We just have your words to go by, and that is not enough. Riggwelter (talk) 13:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - GustenGast, if you are writing a biography then you have a COI, as you are communicating with the family, and most likely will receive either an advance, stipend or royalties for the publication of the biography. Netherzone (talk) 22:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
