Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dorothy Bendel 4080054.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
no consent; photograph poses a safety risk and endangerment risk for family (including minors) Jomama39 (talk) 18:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Keep Nonsense rationale. clpo13(talk) 18:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)- Keep Rubbish. She clearly was aware of the photographer's presence and obviously took no action to prevent this image being taken. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, from what I could tell this person doesn't seem to have any issue with the photographer and I don't see how this image "poses a safety risk and endangerment risk for family (including minors)", claims like that should be supported by evidence, otherwise it's simply paranoia. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- comment i tend to honor deletion requests of subject not in use. personality rights tag is not enough. waiting for confirmation. you might well think that a flashy camera is notorious, but readers have tunnel vision, and acquiescence is not consent.
Delete subject request confirmed. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 00:05, 5 June 2018 (UTC)- Delete As this photo isn’t being used, I’ll support deletion per Slowking4 and as a courtesy to the subject. clpo13(talk) 02:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Comment Parallel discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dorothy Bendel 4080049.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)- Delete @Slowking4: what is it with you and Dorothys?
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and uploader's request. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
