Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cutaway English Electric 12SVT.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Creating user requests deletion Dbromage (talk) 04:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Keep and restore. There is no simple user-request right for deletion at Commons. If the user has some good Commons-acceptable reason for deletion, you're going to have to be a bit clearer as to the reason for it. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:36, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Changing_username/Current_requests#Dbromage_.E2.86.92_gqulnljpeutkzgzm
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dbromage/Archive
I'm not seeing any need to delete these for other reasons. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept - old, PD. Andy Dingley (talk)


 Keep Public domain images. They do not belong to the uploader. Images in use. License is irrevocable. Yann (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The older ones might be, but the recent ones are the uploader's and not PD. There are some other old ones too that have never been tagged. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:26, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you removed old images. Yann (talk) 05:56, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored their list. If Dbromage is going to continue disruptive moves like that, I'd request a re-blocking.
There is no en:template:db-u1 user deletion right on Commons as there is on WP. A valid upload and licence on Commons is irrevocable. If you have some reason to delete them (they're not actually yours, or there's some personality rights issue), then you're going to have to be clear than just "I want". Thanks for confirming that they are definitely yours. Given your actions and blocks at WP, I'm not inclined to see this deletion request as anything other than disruptive pique. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:46, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 13:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]