Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cicely Mary Baker memorialplaquette.jpg
The plaque is copyrighted, it says this at the bottom: Copyright: The Estate of Cicely Mary Barker 1944, 1990. By permission of Frederick Warne. Cicely Mary Barker as a young woman. Courtesy of Martin Barker. -- Deadstar (msg) 09:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- (Keep et Comment) Deadstar, you should make clear. What laws say the photo of this plaquette is copyright-vio? Surely, there are letters "Copyright: The Estate of Cicely Mary Barker etc.". But this plaquette is located and fixed outdoors. This means it is a part of landscape and taking photos of these things are not copyright-vio in our laws. These photos are PD and/or not violation of copyrights.--Stella maris (talk) 02:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ok then, there is copyrighted material visible in the image. This means that this is now a derivative, and as such is liable for deletion. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Per COM:FOP#United Kingdom. –Tryphon☂ 08:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Previous closure was incorrect. UK FOP does not apply to 2D works such as signs or posters unless they are "works of artistic craftsmanship" (which this machine-printed sign certainly is not). Contains numerous non-free copyrighted elements including extensive text, multiple drawings and photos. Dcoetzee (talk) 03:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
I do not mind. However you should know that there is a derived picture, wich is placed at the en.wiki for Cicely Mary Baker .--Waxxzer (talk) 07:35, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete for reasons stated by Dcoetzee. In fact, the plaquette itself states at the bottom "Copyright © The Estate of Cicely Mary Barker, 1944, 1990". I have nominated "File:CMB-memorial-pl-mod.jpg", which is here at the Commons and not at the English Wikipedia, for speedy deletion as an unauthorized derivative work. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 16:20, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)